SEA NE Flash 24-7:
Issued: February 20, 2024
Read this flash online
SEA Announcements
Miss our Northeast Eyes & Ears Winter RE-Fresh?
Last week, SEA’s expert Eyes & Ears staff held our first
annual Northeast Eyes & Ears Winter RE-Fresh Webinar – a new accompaniment
to our Summer RE-Fresh Webinars. The webinar included a Q&A panel,
moderated by John Keene, where eight of our subject-matter experts discussed
the major renewable energy regulatory, policy, wholesale market, and
legislative developments in New England and New York over the past six months,
and previewed our expectations for the months to come.
If you did miss it, the recording and PDF are available now within your sea-ee.com
“Subscriber
Portal“! The webinar was free for all of our Premium subscribers, where
Standard subscribers can still enjoy a 50% discount on the listed price. Please
fill out the form that matches your Subscription tier and we’ll get the
recording and PDF in your inbox.
Click
here to submit your recording request.
Contact sea-deliverables@seadvantage.com
with any questions (such as pricing, Subscription tier(s), and discount codes)!
Top Stories
- MA:
TUE Committee posts summary of energy anchor bills; would
set 10 GW solar goal, require procurements for “clean energy” and storage,
streamline CCA approvals, add guardrails to retail competitive supply,
include storage in EFSB jurisdiction, and update EVSE standards and
planning
- CT:
E&T Committee holds Initial meeting of 2024 session,
raises concepts that will be drafted into bills
- CT:
In proceeding on Medium- and Heavy-Duty EV Charging,
Stakeholders file comments urging for more incentives and rate design
- RI:
E3 presents draft analysis in future of gas docket to
stakeholders
- RI:
RI Energy files 2024-2026 System Reliability Procurement
Investment Proposal for Demand Response; recommends new EV Demand Response
program
- ME:
PUC initiates Rulemaking for proposed RFP for Class IA
projects equal to 5% of load, with preference for projects on contaminated
land; PUC to issue RFP within three months of adopting proposed rules
- NH:
Burgess BioPower files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy,
terminating contract with Eversource; reportedly intends to continue
operation through bankruptcy process
- NH:
New Hampshire Senate votes to pass bills relating to EV
Study Commission, property tax exemptions for grid-scale generators; House
kills bill that would ban state EV purchases, two bills that would
regulate EBikes, and bill that would require solar canopies over large
parking lots
- NH:
New Hampshire House Committees votes to pass bills
relating to filing integrated distribution plans, review and adapt
regulations for nuclear energy development, making nuclear energy
generated after September 1, 2024 a Class I resource, and prohibiting EVs
from parking in parking garages; House kills bills relating to cars
parking in EV-designated parking spots and establishing a commissions to
study barriers to EV adoption
- ISO:
FCA 18 clears at $3.58/kW-month, almost all new resources
were energy storage, solar, wind, or demand-reducing resources
- ISO:
NEPOOL Transmission Committee continues discussions on
Order 2023 compliance; votes not to support stakeholder amendments or
ISO-NE proposal
- R/N:
NESCAUM releases Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed
by nine states pledging to joint action to accelerate electrification as
primary means of transition to building sector emission reduction
Headlines
- Burgess BioPower files for Chapter 11
bankruptcy, terminating contract with Eversource; reportedly intends to
continue operation through bankruptcy process
- New Hampshire Senate votes to pass
bills relating to EV Study Commission, property tax exemptions for
grid-scale generators; House kills bill that would ban state EV purchases,
two bills that would regulate EBikes, and bill that would require solar
canopies over large parking lots
- New Hampshire House Committees votes
to pass bills relating to filing integrated distribution plans, review and
adapt regulations for nuclear energy development, making nuclear energy
generated after September 1, 2024 a Class I resource, and prohibiting EVs
from parking in parking garages; House kills bills relating to cars
parking in EV-designated parking spots and establishing a commissions to
study barriers to EV adoption
- House Executive Departments and
Administration Committee holds Feb 13 Public Hearing on Bill to update the
New Hampshire Building Code; Nongovernmental Organizations support,
construction industry and Building Code Review Board oppose amendment that
would also update Energy Code
- Majority of the House Environment and
Agriculture Committee reports Constitutional Amendment Concurrent
Resolution regarding environment and natural resources as Inexpedient to
Legislate
- PUC authorizes Governance Council to
include a regional approach for the GRIP grant application for a statewide
multi-use energy platform, contingent on monthly progress reports
2024
New England Legislative Tracking Spreadsheet Update
SEA's most up to date Legislative Tracking Spreadsheet can be found here.
Please feel free to contact Jim
Kennerly with any questions regarding New England legislative tracking.
Massachusetts
TUE Committee posts summary of energy anchor bills; would
set 10 GW solar goal, require procurements for “clean energy” and storage,
streamline CCA approvals, add guardrails to retail competitive supply, include
storage in EFSB jurisdiction, and update EVSE standards and planning
As discussed in NE Flash 24-6, on
February 7, 2024, the Massachusetts General Court’s Joint Telecommunications,
Utilities, and Energy (TUE) Committee reported many of its bills from
committee, including five separate “anchor bills” on energy-related topics.
Though, at the time of publication of this article, the revised bill texts were
not yet available on the General Court website, we provide links to the draft
bill texts and high-level summaries below. The bill numbers represent the
legislative vehicles for the bills. We summarize the bills below, organized by
topic area.
H.3216,
“Clean Power anchor bill”
Clean
Power bill summary
If enacted this bill would:
Solar Canopies
(Sections 1, 38, 39):
- Create a new section of the law, Chapter 21A, which
direct the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental
Affairs (EEA) and the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER)
to establish a solar canopy incentive program to encourage development of
and construction of solar canopies. In doing so, the agencies must consult
with an advisory group of energy and environmental stakeholders to make
recommendations on program design. The advisory group shall provide
recommendations no later than 1 year after the effective date of the act
and DOER must implement the program no later than 2 years after the
effective date of the act.
Non-EDC Offshore Wind
Offtake (Sections 2 & 3):
- Direct the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MassCEC)
to issue guidance to businesses, nonprofit organizations, and
municipalities on how to enter into long-term contracts to purchase
offshore wind energy, and post the guidance on the MassCEC website by
December 31, 2024. The bill also directs the MassCEC to develop a
strategic coastal report outlining when and how the state should repurpose
ports to support the State’s offshore wind industry, and submit the report
to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU) and the General
Court by July 31, 2024. According to the bill, “the report should include
a strategic vision for a comprehensive port infrastructure offshore wind
network in Massachusetts.”:
EDC Climate
Resiliency Plans and Microgrids (Sections 4, 15, 16):
- Direct the DPU to require that all electric
distribution and transmission companies (EDCs) file a climate
vulnerability and resilience plan by December 31, 2024, and every five
years thereafter. Plans filed by the EDCs must include a description of
how the company is implementing its climate vulnerability and resilience
plan in its response to emergency events and in its efforts to minimize
the effects of extreme weather on the company’s infrastructure and
operations, including disruptions to service.
- Provide that, for the purposes of climate resiliency
and mitigation, no right to exclusive service or franchise shall prevent a
municipality, or agencies of the Commonwealth, or private electric
customers in coordination with a municipality, within an electric or gas
company’s service territory, from (i) establishing an energy
microgrid or district energy system; (ii) sharing electric generation
or storage resources among facilities that are contiguous and owned by the
same utility customer, irrespective of the number of electric meters
installed at such facilities; or (iii) using public rights of way to
conduct electrical conduit or other energy resources point to point where
the municipality deems there is benefit from sharing energy resources.
DOER Storage
procurement, with mid- and long-duration carveout (Sections 5 & 9):
Adds definitions for the following terms to Chapter
25A, the enabling statute for DOER:
- Long-duration energy storage
- “An energy storage
system capable of dispatching electricity at its full rated capacity for
greater than ten hours.”
- Mid-duration energy storage
- “An energy storage
system capable of dispatching electricity at its full rated capacity for
a period greater than 4 hours and up to 10 hours.”
- “An energy storage
system capable of dispatching electricity at its full rated capacity for
greater than twenty-four hours.”
We note that these definitions were inserted by Chapter
179 of the Acts of 2022 into the Green
Communities Act, but not the more general DOER authorizing statute
definitions.
- Direct DOER to issue procurements for 4.5 GW of energy
storage, of which 3 GW must be mid-duration storage, 750 MW must be
long-duration storage, and 750 MW must be multi-day energy storage.
CPS participation for
vintage, paired generators (Section 6):
- Amend the definition for “Qualified RPS resource” for
the purposes of the clean peak standard by making eligible any renewable
energy generating source which commenced operation before January 1, 2019,
if the source is coupled with an on-site or off-site energy storage system
capable of storing 4 hours of the resource’s installed capacity.
Previously, coupled resources were not eligible.
Fusion Class I
qualification (Sections 6A, 6B, 12, 13):
- Add fusion energy to the list of RPS Class I renewable
energy sources
- Add fusion energy to the definitions of “renewable
energy generating source”, “Class I renewable energy generating source”,
and “renewable energy.”
Geothermal
qualifications (Section 7):
- Amend the definition for “alternative energy generating
source” by removing the requirement that temperature differences in
ground, air or water, have to be “naturally occurring.” This could permit
resources that inject heat into the ground or water as a form of storage
to qualify.
Alternative Energy
Credit kicker for installing emission control device (Section 8):
- Provide that thermal energy facilities which install an
emissions control device(s) shall earn an alternative energy credit for
each 1.7 million British thermal units (BTU) of net useful thermal energy.
Under current law, an eligible generator earns 1 credit for every 3.412
million BTUs.
Advanced metering
rollout (Sections 10, 18, 42, 43):
- Define “Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)” as
(listed verbatim):
- A meter and network
communications technology that measures, records, and transmits
electricity usage by the end user at a minimum of hourly intervals and is
capable of providing data to the end user and authorized third parties in
real time or near real time.
- Require EDCs to implement AMI in a timely and
cost-effective manner, submit AMI deployment proposals within 180
days of the passage of this legislation, and deploy AMI infrastructure
within five years of approval.
- Direct DPU and the EDCs to investigate and engage
in a process to expand the use of distributed grid edge software on AMI
meters.
Electronic solar and
storage permits (Section 11):
- Allow electronic submission of permit applications to
cities and towns for solar and energy storage projects.
Moderate-income
discount rate (Sections 14, 19, 40):
- Direct the DPU to require that EDCs provide discounted
rates for moderate-income customers in addition to the existing discounted
rates for low-income customers.
- Direct the DPU to promulgate regulations to implement
the establishment of a moderate-income discount eligibility rate.
Interconnection
process and cost allocation (Sections 17, 44, 45):
- Direct DPU to promulgate rules specifying a time limit
for interconnection application to an interconnection services agreement
and a time limit for the EDC’s commencement of design of required
interconnection-related upgrades to an authorization to interconnect.
- Direct the DPU to establish a cost allocation framework
to implement electric-sector modernization plans.
- Direct the DPU to establish a distributed generation
(DG) and clean energy ombudsperson, as well as an interconnection working
group to consider improvements to interconnection tariffs, technical
standards, and processes.
Grid-Enhancing
Technology grid planning (Section 20):
- For base rate proceedings and other proceedings in
which an EDC proposes capital improvements or additions to the
distribution system, require the EDC to conduct a cost-effectiveness and
timetable analysis of multiple strategies, including grid enhancing
technologies (GETs), advanced reconductors, or energy storage used as a
distribution resource. The distribution company may propose a performance
incentive mechanism for the cost-effective deployment of these
technologies. Every five years, each EDC would be required to make
compliance filings with the DPU, ISO‑NE, and the legislature regarding
their GET deployment.
Low-income
verification mandate (Sections 21, 41):
- Direct the DOER to implement a verification process to
ensure that low-income customers are those who have an income at or below
80% of the area median income or 200% of the federal poverty level or are
living in a low-income multi-unit building.
Biomass study repeal
(Section 22):
- Repeal the requirement for a study of biomass energy
from Chapter
8 of the Acts of 2021, An Act Creating A Next-Generation Roadmap For
Massachusetts Climate Policy
“Clean Energy”
solicitation (Section 23 -27):
- Define “Clean energy generation” as:
- (i) firm service
hydroelectric generation from hydroelectric generation alone; (ii) new
Class I RPS eligible resources that are firmed up with energy storage or
firm service hydroelectric generation; (iii) new Class I renewable
portfolio standard eligible resources or (iv) nuclear power generation
that is located in the ISO‑NE control area and commenced commercial
operation before January 1, 2011.
- Require all EDCs, in coordination with the DOER, to
solicit proposals for clean energy generation and enter into contracts for
approximately 9.45 million MWh annually by December 21, 2030 (i.e., in
additional to the amount of clean energy generation purchased in 2022).
Hourly clean energy
matching, regional clean energy markets, consolidated billing, and retail rate
review (Sections 28-37):
Clean Energy Goals
& Procurement:
- Revise the authorization for DOER to competitively
solicit clean energy generation by moving the deadline from December 21,
2022 to December 31, 2025.
- Require (whereas previously it was just allowed) EEA to
promulgate regulations establishing or governing a regional or multi-state
clean energy market to facilitate the development of clean energy
generation resource.
- Established a solar target of 10 GW by 2030, and direct
DOER to create sub-targets for different types of solar installations and
increase SMART Program adders. The bill would also direct DOER to
establish annual storage goals to align with meeting the Governor’s 2030
storage target goals (unstated in the bill but during her campaign the
Governor set a goal of “quadrupling energy storage deployment”).
- Require that no later than January 1, 2030, all
electricity procured by the Commonwealth for State facilities must be 95%
derived from an hourly 24/7 load following zero-emission product. This
product can be located in ISO-NE, NYISO, or PJM Interconnection.
- Direct DOER to conduct a review to determine the
effectiveness of the Commonwealth’s offshore wind procurements, consult
with the clean energy industry as a part of the review process, and submit
the review and recommendations to the Legislature by September 1, 2024.
- Require that starting in 2026 and in all subsequent
years, the minimum standard for Waste-to-Energy facilities will be
maintained at 3.7% of electrical energy sales (as opposed to the current
decrease to 2.35% in 2026).
Retail Rate Review:
- Require DPU to conduct an adjudicatory proceeding
to determine the efficacy of current retail rate structures in achieving
statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction and clean energy deployment
goals, and explore alternative rate designs. The DPU would be required to
submit a report on this proceeding to the Legislature by December 15,
2025.
Net Metering &
Consolidated Billing:
- Relating to a net crediting payment mechanism, require
the EDCs to:
- Include the monthly
subscription charge of a host project or Solar Tariff Generation Unit
(SGTU) on the monthly bill.
- Remit payment for
those charges to the host project or SGTU system.
- Allow the EDCs to
impose a reasonable fee for a host project or SGTU system that uses net
crediting.
- Require DPU to require the EDCs to implement
consolidated billing on Alternative On-Bill Credit Low-Income Community
Shared Solar Generation Units, and apply the bill credit to the customer
account while remitting the developer/owner portion directly to the
develop/owner.
Meter Socket Adapter
Criteria:
- Require the EDCs to create criteria and guidelines for
approval of eligible meter socket adapters (MSAs), and requires utilities
allow manufacturers to install and maintain MSAs that meet said criteria.
H.3219, “Municipalities anchor bill” Municipalities anchor bill summary
If enacted, this bill would:
- Define a “Public Aggregator” as:
a municipality or group of municipalities that groups interested electricity
customers within its municipal boundaries to facilitate or otherwise arrange
the purchase and sale of electric energy and energy-related services through an
electrical load aggregation program as set forth in section
134; provided, however, that public aggregator shall not mean a supplier.
- Require that the public aggregator shall submit a plan
to the DPU for approval, which DPU would be required to approve provided
the plan complies with and contains the structural elements laid out
below. If DPU does not approve a submitted plan within 90 days of
submission, that plan would be automatically be approved.
- Clarify that the competitive supplier providing service
to customers of an aggregation are exempt from certain DPU requirements,
on the basis that the public aggregator will take on those duties.
- Limit DPU review to the program structure and not
certain specifics of the program (outlined below):
- Program Structural
Elements (DPU Review)
- the provision of
universal access;
- the provision of
reliability;
- the provision of
equitable treatment of all classes or subclasses of customers;
- an organizational
structure for program management and decision making;
- the provision of
customer education;
- its method of setting
and providing funding for program administration;
- description of how
program rates will be set and structured;
- municipalities acting
as a group shall include the methods for entering and terminating
agreements with other entities;
- the rights and
responsibilities of program participants;
- its intent to offer
optional opt-in products or services;
- and its method for
suspending or terminating the program
- Program Specific
Elements (NO DPU Review)
- program funding
levels;
- specific uses of
program funds;
- rates;
- supply terms;
- timing of program
start;
- product offerings both
on an opt-out and opt-in basis (if applicable), including any periodic
changes in the price or composition of such product offerings;
- the format and
mechanisms for delivering all notices to customers; accommodating
consumers with limited English proficiency;
- and contract terms and
conditions for electric energy and energy-related services
- Specify that all terms of the bill would be applicable
to all plans pending review before the DPU as of this bill’s effective
date (i.e. the DPU must act on currently pending plans withing 90 days,
with review limited to structural elements), and that all public
aggregator with plans currently pending before the DPU shall be subject to
the terms of are not required to file amendments to their plans.
- Direct the DPU to issue an order within 60 days
requiring that each EDC shall provide any public aggregator with an
approved plan who requests it, a list of names, mailing addresses, email
addresses, and service addressed of all electric customers within the
municipality(ies).
H. 3155, “Competitive Supply anchor
bill”
Competitive Supply bill summary
If enacted, this bill would make the following additions or alterations to
statute:
- Marketer
Definition (Section 1): Defines and Energy Marketer as “any person, firm,
partnership, association or private corporation that markets, advertises,
or otherwise offers to sell generation service to retail customers that is
acting as an agent for a supplier.”
- Marketing
Practices (Sections 3, 4, and 7): Amends Section
1F of Chapter 164, which concerns consumer protections for energy
sales, to require that:
- Energy brokers, energy
marketers, and other suppliers pay a one-time fee of at least $10,000
(new applications) and execute and maintain a $5,000,000 bond for each
retail license
- Suppliers provide
“appropriate” training to any third-parties selling electric service on
their behalf, except for third-party Electricity Brokers and consultants
or agents acting on behalf of customers and receiving compensation as
part of the customer’s electric contract price
- DOER develop a
“training and educational program” for licensed competitive suppliers
regarding DOER’s “regulations regarding sales, consumer protection and
any other matter [DOER] deems appropriate,” and requires a representative
from each licensed competitive supplier to pass this program before an a
license is granted
- energy brokers, energy
marketers, and other suppliers using in-person or door-to-door marketing
practices:
- Terminate an in-person
or door-to-door interaction if the target individual is unable to
understand or communicate in the language being used to conduct the
interaction
- Wear an identification
badge which is always visible during an interaction
- energy brokers, energy
marketers, and other suppliers using in-person or door-to-door marketing
practices or telephone solicitations:
- Use a third-party
verification process for which the phone numbers used for third-party
verifications can be affiliated with said third party (i.e., they are
prohibited from using non-fixed voice over internet protocols)
- DOER establish an
“office of retail market oversight” funded through any license fees and
an annual assessment of retail suppliers and broker, not to exceed
$10,000 per licensed entity, to monitor competitive conditions, identify
barriers to retail competition, and explore and propose solutions to any
identified barriers
- The office would be
required to publish a quarterly report with the number of complaints
filed against each supplier and any other information deemed relevant
and have the power to impose a “probationary status” on any supplier
that is in violation of relevant regulations
- Customer Complaints (Sections 5 and 6):
- Extend the time during
which customers may file a complaint with DOER that their retail
generation service has been switched without their prior authorization
from 30 days to 2 years after the statement date of the notice
indicating said switch
- Increase the maximum
penalty from $3,000 to $5,000 for the second or further offense of any
generation company, supplier, or aggregator that DOER determines to have
switched a customer’s service provider without proper authorization
- Low-income
residential customers (Section 8): adds the following statutory definitions (provided
verbatim):
- Low-income customer: a
retail customer in the commonwealth who is on a residential low-income
discount distribution rate … or participates in a low-income energy
assistance program, including, but not limited to, the Low-Income Home
Energy Affordability Program (LIHEAP)
- Residential retail
customer: a retail customer in the Commonwealth who is on a residential
distribution rate
- Prohibits suppliers
from executing or renewing a contract for generation services with any
low-income customer
- Requires DOER to
establish a competitive procurement process for retail electric service
for low-income customers in each electric distribution company (EDC)
service territory
- New
Requirements for suppliers (Section 8):
- As a condition of
licensure or licensure renewal as of July 1, 2023, and subject to a
penalty of $10,000 per violation per day, suppliers shall:
- Not extend a supply
agreement with a residential retail customer without at least two
notices prior to the end of the supply agreement’s stated term
- Not charge a
termination or early cancellation fee to a residential retail customer
except for charges for devices, equipment, or “other non-commodity
services”
- Provide, at least
quarterly, a report listing each rate the supplier charged to
residential retail customers in the prior quarter and the number of
low-income and non-low-income residential retail customers charged each
rate
- Publish at least one
publicly available rate on DOER’s website
- Provide, at least
annually, data concerning any RECs retired in connection with
residential retail service, to be published on DOER’s website
- Not transfer any
license without prior approval by DOER
- Not transfer any
customer to another supplier without at least 30 days’ notice to DOER,
subject to DOER’s denial of the transfer or requiring “certain
conditions”
- Not impersonate an
employee of an EDC or misrepresent the business relationship between the
supplier and an EDC
- DOER shall publish, at
least quarterly, each supplier’s and EDC’s complaint data
H.3215, “Siting and Permitting anchor
bill”Siting and Permitting bill summary
A summary of the bill, organized by section, is provided below:
- Energy
Facilities Siting Board jurisdiction over storage (Sections 1-3):
- Includes the review of
Energy Storage facilities with a capacity of 100 MW or more under the
jurisdiction of the EFSB. In doing so, the bill defines “energy storage
system”, including requirements that energy storage facilities, as
defined, deliver benefits to the grid or reduce greenhouse gases. As
discussed in NE
Flash 23-21, on May 11, 2023, the EFSB issued its Final
Decision in Docket
EFSB21-02 finding that it lacked jurisdictional authority over energy
storage facilities.
- Electric
decarbonization infrastructure projects (Sections 5 through 10): creates Chapter 164C,
which contains provisions relating to the expedited permitting of “”.
- Electric
decarbonization infrastructure projects are defined as proposed EDC
projects that:
- Improve reliability,
communications, and resiliency;
- Enable the
interconnection of distributed generation, energy storage, or
electrification;
- Adapt the grid to
climate change impacts;
- Accelerate the
retirement of fossil fuel infrastructure; or
- Otherwise facilitate
the ability to meet statewide greenhouse gas reduction requirements.
- Requires (EDCs to
contact municipalities regarding proposed electric decarbonization
infrastructure projects to solicit any objections to each project and, if
found, resolve such objections. Applications for such programs may be
filed following the conclusion of the dispute resolution process.
- Requires the EFSB,
within 90 days of enactment, to create an Electric Sector Decarbonization
Permitting Office led by an board-appointed director. The office would be
funded through permitting fees and charged with reviewing electric
decarbonization infrastructure projects. The permitting office would be
charged with:
- The development and
facilitating of permitting and host community engagement processes
relating to electric decarbonization infrastructure projects, including
the development of standard permitting conditions and best management
practices.
- Ensuring all permits
advance public safety, environmental protection, decarbonization,
mitigation of land use impacts, ratepayer protection, and protection of
environmental justice populations.
- Approving and issuing
consolidated permits for approved projects. Such permits shall encompass
all necessary state, regional, local authorizations, and authorizations
needed for exercise eminent domain. No city or town or regional
authority shall have authority over any qualifying project.
- Monitoring the
construction and operation of qualifying projects.
- The Electric Sector
Decarbonization Permitting Office would be required to rule on permits
for electric decarbonization infrastructure projects and file such
permits with the EFSB within one year of receiving the application. If
the EFSB fails to rule on a permit approved by the Office within one
month, it would be automatically approved.
- Environmental
Justice Provisions (Sections 10 and 11):
- Create the
“Massachusetts Community Just Transition Trust Fund.” The fund would be
funded through a surcharge on projects equal to 1% of total electric
sector infrastructure project costs. The surcharge for projects located
in Environmental Justice areas is 1.5%. Monies from the fund would be
used to assist environmental justice communities with decarbonization
efforts and increasing their resiliency to climate change impacts.
- Establish an
environmental justice community advocate, to be appointed by the
secretary. The advocate would be responsible for reviewing electric
sector infrastructure projects in environmental justice communities,
coordinating comments from community groups, and recommending mitigation
to be funded through the Massachusetts Community Just Transition Fund.
H. 3218, “Building decarbonization
anchor bill”
Building decarbonization bill summary
Energy Efficiency
Policy and Programs: (Sections 1-11)
- Authorizes the DPU to require the EDCs to establish an
“enhanced homebuyer program” that provides energy efficiency incentives
for purchasers of 1-5 unit homes. The incentives must include:
(i) free weatherization services, (ii) multilingual customer
support, (iii) project facilitation services, (iv) technical
assistance, and (v) a $250 incentive payment
- Directs DOER to consult with the DPU, EDCs, Municipal
Light Plants (MLPs), and MassSave to offer incentives and rebates for
homeowners to convert to high-efficiency lighting.
- Reforms the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC)
membership by:
- Replacing a seat
representing the manufacturing industry with a seat representing
environmental justice and equity
- Changes the organized
labor seat to a “workforce development and organized labor” seat
- Revises the voting seat
representing energy efficiency service business to include energy
efficiency businesses with over ten employees
- Replaces the nonvoting
seat representing energy efficiency business with a nonvoting seat
representing MassCEC
- Adds the following statutory requirements for the EEAC:
- Promotion of beneficial
electrification
- Adds decarbonization as
a goal
Energy Efficient
Lighting (Sections 5-6, 28, 36-37)
- Phases out most fluorescent light bulbs by 2025
- Requires public street lighting to meet certain
requirements including minimizing light pollution and not exceeding 3000K
of color temperature
- Directs the Massachusetts Department of Transportation
(MassDOT) to conduct a report on existing roadway lighting costs, health,
safety, and environmental impacts, best practices and create a plan to
reduce lighting operational costs through installation of more efficient
lights and removal of unnecessary roadway lighting
- Directs the DPU to develop a rates for “part-night
service for unmetered roadway or parking lot lighting,” and
“unmetered roadway or parking-lot lighting using less than 25 watts of
electricity”
Oil and gas
regulation and oversight (Sections 12-13, 29-30, 32)
- Requires oil and propane suppliers of all sizes to
report price, inventory, and product delivery data. Currently, only
petroleum companies with a storage capacity over 50,000 gallons are
required to report data.
- Prohibits gas system expansions that increase
greenhouse gas emissions
- Repeals language in 2014 gas leaks bill requiring the
DPU to promote “affordability, availability, and feasibility of natural
gas service for new customers”
- Includes generators and distributors of geothermal
energy in the definition of “gas company”
Utility Reporting and
Oversight (Sections 13-14)
- Requires all electric and gas distribution companies,
transmission companies, distribution companies, suppliers, and aggregators
companies to report data on:
- Loads served
- Billing amount
- REC purchases
- “supply product
offerings”
- Changes statute authorizing DOER to perform assessments
on electric and gas utility companies (excluding MLPs), to:
- Increase the cap on
DOER’s assessments,
- Remove limitation on
the use of money collected through assessments
Electric Vehicle (EV)
charging infrastructure (Sections 15-17, 22-27, 33-35, 38-40)
- Transfers Authority to oversee public charging stations
from DOER to the Department of Standards
- EV charging stations
must register with division of standards by January 1, 2026
- Adds a fee of $50 for parking a non-EV in a public
parking spot with a charging station, $100 for second offense
- Adds “Fast DC,” “Level 1,” and “Level 2” [EV Chargers],
and “flexible demand” to definitions for household appliances (see bill
for details of definitions)
- Authorizes the DOER Commissioner to:
- update appliance
standards to facilitate deployment of flexible demand technologies
- update regulations to
reflect additional changes to appliance standards
- Updates Energy Star standards for EV supply equipment
(EVSE) to match current EPA guidelines
- Directs MassDOT and DOER, and EDCs to study, identify,
and plan, for EV fast charging hubs at “optimal sites” along Massachusetts
highways. The plans must align with demand projections to meet 2045
emissions goals.
- Directs DPU to approve
or deny plan within six months of submission
- Directs EDCs to create a plan for system upgrades
needed to support electrification of at least five industrial areas with
fleet depots, with a priority on EJ communities, within 18 months of the
effective date of the bill
- Directs DPU to approve
or deny plan within six months of submission
- Adds the Executive Director of MassCEC or a designee to
the membership of the EV Infrastructure Coordinating Council (EVICC)
- Extends the use of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
(RGGI) funds for the Massachusetts Offers Rebates for Electric Vehicles
(MOR-EV) program through 2027
- Restricts homeowners associations, condo associations,
historic district commissions, and neighborhood conservation districts
from preventing installation of EV charging stations
- Repeals law
establishing “right to charge” in the City of Boston, to remove
conflicting laws. The “right to charge” law allows Boston condo owners to
install charging stations in their parking spaces
- Orders all municipalities to adopt land use ordinances
that:
- Create a streamlined
permitting process for EV charging stations
- Classify all levels of
EV charging stations as permitted accessory and primary use in all zoning
districts
- Address EV charging in
parking minimum requirements
- Specify review
parameters and deadlines for applications to install EV charging stations
- Directs DOER and MassDOT to develop and publish online
model land use ordinances within 6 months of enactment
Building
Decarbonization (Sections 18-21, 31)
- Requires that all public education buildings, including
public higher education campuses, shall receive energy audits, within 24
months, at no cost. Following the audits, qualifying schools will be
eligible to receive funding for energy efficiency improvements and
installations of renewable energy
- Schools in
environmental justice communities are prioritized for energy audits,
energy efficiency improvements, and installations of renewable energy
- Creates a Healthy and Sustainable Schools Office within
DOER, with a director appointed by the Governor, two members appointed by
state senate (one of which must represent organized labor), and 2 members
appointed by “the Assembly” (one of whom must represent organized labor).
The Office will oversee the energy audits and school decarbonization
- We believe that “the
Assembly” is an error in the legislative text, and the language is
intended to refer to the Massachusetts House of Representatives
- Establishes eligibility criteria, standards, and rules
governing how landlords may charge tenants for costs associated with
operating and maintaining heat pumps
Stakeholders submit joint letter proposing revisions to
interconnection working groups; request more formal process for DPU action on
findings including involvement of DPU in working groups
On February 7, 2024, a group of renewable energy stakeholders submitted a Letter
to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU) in Docket 19-55,
which was opened to consider issues relating to the interconnection of
distributed generation (DG). Specifically, the Letter provided proposed changes
to the process and structure of various interconnection working groups,
including:
- Technical Standards Review Group (TSRG)
- Energy Storage Interconnection Review Group (ESIRG)
- Interconnection Implementation Review Group (IIRG)
As discussed in NE
Special Flash 23-22.2, on June 6, 2023, in Docket
19-55, the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU) issued
an Order
Establishing Interconnection Implementation Review Group (IIRG).
Stakeholders represented in the Letter include the Interstate Renewable Energy
Council, Inc. (IREC), the Northeast Clean Energy Council (NECEC), Solar Energy
Business Association of New England (SEBANE), Agilitas Energy, Inc., BlueWave
Solar, CleanCapital, Fermata Energy, Galehead Development, Greenfield Solar,
Independence Solar, New Leaf Energy, Nexamp, OnSite Renewables, Parallel
Products Solar Energy, LLC, Pope Energy, PowerOptions, Renewable Energy
Massachusetts, LLC, ReVision Energy, RWE Clean Energy, Solect Energy, Stem, and
Zero-Point Development (collectively the “Clean Energy Parties”).
In the Letter, the Clean Energy Parties argued that:
- A lack of DPU engagement in the groups and the lack of
an independent facilitator in working groups hinders progress.
- The working groups lack a clearly defined process for:
- Seeking formal DPU
review of items on which the participants fail to reach consensus.
- Bringing issues to the
DPU for action when participants succeed at reaching consensus.
To remedy these issues, the Clean Energy Parties proposed a regulatory
process “under which Working Groups consider specific issues on a defined
timeline, a summary of those discussions is presented to the DPU by an
independent facilitator, and the DPU formally reviews and issues decisions on
both consensus and non-consensus items in an open docket.” In addition, the
Clean Energy Parties recommended that:
- The DPU require the EDCs to comply with Data Requests
submitted during Working Group discussions.
- The DPU direct the TSRG to “amend its bylaws to state
it is the DPU, not the EDCs, who have final authority over tariff
revisions, technical standards, and other substantive topics discussed in
the TSRG.”
- The DPU clarify that “issues which the TSRG refuses to
discuss may be discussed in the IIRG, and ultimately submitted to the DPU
for formal review.”
Lastly, the Letter contains discussion of the DPU’s authority and managing
potential ex-parte
contacts in relation to the proposal.
Healey Administration to deploy $50 million in ARPA funds to
support EV charging infrastructure
On February 7, 2024, the Healey Administration announced
that it will deploy $50 million in American
Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to support electric vehicle (EV) technology
programs at the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MassCEC); charging
infrastructure investments for the State’s fleet; public charging station
inspections; and an analysis of EV charging needs, to be undertaken by
the EV Infrastructure Coordinating Council (EVICC).
The funding will be dispersed as follows:
- $12.5 million to MassCEC to install overnight curbside
charging stations at multi-unit dwellings
- $9.5 million to MassCEC to undertake a market
characterization study (to include deployment projects) investigating
mobile charging financial models and use cases for medium- and heavy-duty
vehicles (MHDVs)
- $9.5 million for fleet EV charging infrastructure at
60+ “high priority sites” at state facilities, and an additional $1.5
million to install EV chargers at other state facilities
- $8 million to MassCEC to support the electrification of
taxi and rideshare fleets, namely, the deployment of level 2 and
fast-charging infrastructure projects, with a focus on environmental
justice communities (we note that Section 47 of Chapter
179 of the Acts of 2022 required the DPU to create a program to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions from taxi and rideshare fleets)
- $8 million to MassCEC to perform a market
characterization analysis and demonstration projects to support
vehicle-to-grid and/or vehicle-to-building projects
- $604,000 to purchase testing equipment for EV chargers,
and to hire staff to inspect public charging stations
- $396,000 to enable the EVICC to perform an EV charging
needs analysis
Wind Power Incentive Jobs Credit and Wind Power Incentive
Investment Credit language for Tax Year 2023 posted
On February 6, 2024, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR) updated its
2023 Personal Income
(Chapter 62) and Corporate Excise (Chapter 63) Tax Law Changes related to
the Wind Power Incentive Jobs Credit and the Wind Power Incentive Investment
Credit. As discussed in NE
Flash 22-32, Chapter
179, An Act Driving Clean Energy and Offshore Wind established an offshore
wind tax incentive program through which these two wind power incentives may be
authorized. Both credits are applicable for tax years beginning on or after
January 1, 2023, and until tax years ending on or before December 31, 2032. The
language on each is as follows (verbatim from the DOR’s post):
Wind Power Incentive
Jobs Credit
A business subject to tax under Chapter
62 or Chapter
63 may, to the extent authorized by the offshore wind tax incentive program
established in Chapter
23J, be allowed a refundable credit in an amount determined by the Massachusetts
Clean Energy Technology Center [(MassCEC)], in consultation with the [DOR]. A
business taking this credit must commit to the creation of a minimum of 50 net
new permanent full-time employees in Massachusetts.
Wind Power Incentive
Investment Credit
A business subject to tax under Chapter
62 or Chapter
63 may, to the extent authorized by the offshore wind tax incentive program
established in Chapter
23J, be allowed a refundable credit in an amount, as determined by the
[MassCEC], of up to 50 percent of its total capital investment in an offshore
wind facility.
DOER schedules Home Energy Rebates Public Input Session for
March 18
During the week of February 12, 2024, the Massachusetts Department of Energy
Resources (DOER) announced
that it has scheduled a
public input session to discuss its Home Efficiency and Electrification Rebate
Programs for March 18 at 1:00pm.
For context,—and as discussed in NE
Flash 23-50—on December 8, 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released
new resources to help state energy offices, such as DOER, apply for and
implement their home energy efficiency programs under Public
Law No: 117-169, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) Home
Energy Rebates (HER) program and the Home
Electrification and Appliance Rebates (HEAR) program.
In its latest announcement, DOER noted that it plans to apply for funding
under both programs in the spring (spring 2024). DOER anticipates receiving
$73,233,910 and $72,809,130 for each program, respectively. We note that this
funding is provided by the IRA, so DOER will receive this funding if they meet
the program’s minimum requirements. In anticipation of submitting its
application, DOER has scheduled this public input session to present a straw
proposal for program design and solicit community input on its proposed
deployment plans. Interested parties can register here.
DOER schedules inaugural town hall for February 29

The Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) announced that it
has scheduled
an inaugural Town Hall on
February 29, 2024, from 11:30 am – 1:00 pm. DOER leadership
will introduce the Department, provide an overview of key initiatives, share a
timeline of engagement opportunities, and host a Q&A session. The session
will be hosted virtually, and registration is available here.
DOER launches vehicle electrification survey seeking
feedback from fleet owners and operators; Responses Due February 28

On February 16, 2024, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources
(DOER) announced
the launch of a Vehicle
Electrification Feedback Survey. DOER is seeking feedback from fleet owners
and operators on barriers to electrification Responses are due by February 28, 2024. The
State plans to apply for an Environmental Protection Agency Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant to support the MOR-EV Trucks incentive program and
Fleet Advisor program, as well as provide additional support to medium- and
heavy-duty fleet owners and operators interested in fleet electrification; the
survey results will inform these measures.
Other Massachusetts News of Note
- Bristol
Community College to launch National Offshore Wind Institute: On February 9, 2024,
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MassCEC) announced
that Bristol Community College will launch the National Offshore Wind
Institute (NOWI) and offer four training modules delivered by the Global
Wind Organization (GWO): 1) Basic Safety Training, 2) Basic Technical
Training, 3) Advanced Rescue Training, 4) Enhanced First Aid. NOWI emerged
from the 2018
Massachusetts Offshore Wind Work Assessment which identified that
establishing offshore wind training facilities would help potential clean
energy workforce for future job opportunities.
- DOE
selects UMass Amherst to lead new national Academic Center for Reliability
and Resilience of Offshore Wind: On February 8, 2024, University of Massachusetts
Amherst (UMass) announced
that it has been selected by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to
establish the Academic Center for Reliability and Resilience of Offshore
Wind (ARROW). ARROW has three main objectives: 1) offering training
and interdisciplinary education for future offshore wind professionals,
2) conducting research on offshore wind system, 3) community
engagement with diverse stakeholders. ARROW will be led by UMass and
includes eight universities, three national laboratories, two state-level
energy offices, and other industry and stakeholder
groups.
Back to Headlines
Connecticut
E&T Committee holds Initial meeting of 2024 session,
raises concepts that will be drafted into bills
On February 8, 2023, the Connecticut General Assembly’s Joint Energy and
Technology (E&T) Committee held its first meeting
of the 2024 legislative session (last discussed in NE Special Flash 24-5.3).
The agenda for the meeting can be found here.
At the meeting, the E&T Committee voted to draft several “concepts”
(i.e., the bill titles listed below) into full bills with legislative language.
House Chair Jonathan Steinberg (D) noted that this is not necessarily the
complete list of concepts that would be raised into bills this session, but it
does represent the vast majority of the bills that would be raised in 2024.
Chair Steinberg noted that HB 5004 would be a legislative vehicle for energy
and environmental topics in this session, and that the energy potions of that
bill would be heard in the E&T Committee, and combined with HB 5004 later
in the session. HB 5004 does not yet appear on the General Assembly’s webpage.
Chair Steinberg noted that some of the concepts have been drafted into full
bills by legislative staff, while others were in their initial phases. All
bills must be reported from the E&T Committee by March 26, known as the
Joint Favorable (JF) deadline in Connecticut. Chair Steinberg informed the
Committee members that the E&T Committee would only have three or four
hearings due to the timeline of the deadline, and around three informal
information sessions.
We list the bill concepts related to renewable energy below, along with any
commentary from Committee Chair Steinberg:
- An Act Concerning Energy Procurements
- This bill would
“contemplate how [the General Assembly] enables the [Department of Energy
and Environmental Protection (DEEP)] to make procurements
- An Act Establishing A Municipal Electric Aggregation
Program
- This bill could enable
municipalities to “take control of their energy future” in a
cost-effective manner
- An Act Concerning Data Centers
- This bill would address
potential load growth from data centers
- An Act Concerning Consumer Protection For Customers Of
Solar Power Companies
- This bill would address
consumer protections for solar customers
- An Act Concerning A Study Of Combining Energy Storage
System Deployment With New Residential Solar Installations
- This bill would examine
encouraging paired solar and storage
- We note that
currently, the respective solar programs and the storage programs in the
State are separate, and the bill appears to contemplate either combining
them or otherwise incenting co-location.
- An Act Concerning Solar Projects Throughout The State
- This bill may be an
omnibus solar bill
- An Act Concerning Revisions To The State’s
Non-Residential Renewable Energy Program And Shared Clean Energy Facility
Program
- This bill is “still in
its early stages, but that the Non-Residential Renewable Energy Program
And Shared Clean Energy Facility Program have had several years of
procurements, and it may be time to evaluate how they are progressing.
Chair Steinberg notes this bill would likely result in a study.
- An Act Concerning A Study Of Geothermal Energy
- This will be part of HB
5004, and examine applications of geothermal energy
- An Act Concerning Electric Grid Interconnection Points
- Interconnection is one
of the major obstacles to expanding renewable energy, and the Committee
wants to discuss a strategic plan for identifying interconnection points
with the electric distribution companies. (While it is unclear from the
Committee description, we interpret this as identifying the least costly
points of interconnection.)
- Chairman Steinberg,
upon a question from Rep. Holly Cheeseman (R) clarified that this would
be focused on the state of Connecticut, rather than regional
transmission, and particularly examining what Massachusetts’s framework
for interconnection is, as Massachusetts is “more advanced” (presumably
referring to Capital Infrastructure Projects and/or distributed
generation penetration overall).
- An Act Concerning The Responsibilities Of The
Connecticut Siting Council (CSC)
- Chair Steinberg noted
that the CSC was formed many years ago, and since then has been asked to
take on more and more roles, and that this bill would concern the CSC’s
roles, composition, and the funding needed to fulfill its mandate.
- An Act Concerning Modifications To The Renewable
Portfolio Standard
- This bill would contain
“small tweaks” to the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), and the
Committee would have a “broader conversation” about the RPS going
forwards
- Rep. Stephen Meskers
(D) argued that Connecticut should prioritize in-state renewables by
“weighting” their RECs more heavily.
- An Act Concerning Solicitation Of Run-Of-The-River
Hydropower
- This bill would
implement some of the recommendations from the hydropower task force
established in Special Act No. 23-8
(discussed in NE Flash 23-26).
The hydropower task force’s report is not yet finished but there are
“some recommendations that can be aced on this year.”
Rep. Mushinsky (D) noted she would submit concepts to incent heat pumps in
the State, as well as directing the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory
Authority (PURA) to consider future electrification. It is unclear if the
“electrification” Rep. Mushinsky refers to is electrification of
transportation, buildings, industry, all three, or some combination of the
three.
Chair Steinberg noted there would be an informational forum on solar topics
on February 23.
Environment Committee holds initial meeting of 2024 session;
Committee votes to draft concept bills relating to Siting Council, solar panel
recycling, into full bills; announces upcoming meeting on February 23, public
hearing on February 28

As discussed in NE
Flash 24-5, on February 9, 2024 and February 16, 2024, the Connecticut
General Assembly’s Joint Environment Committee held its first two meetings of
the 2024 legislative session. The agenda for the meetings can be found here
(February 9) and here
(February 16).
At the February 9 meeting,
the Committee voted, via voice vote, to draft 24 concept bills into full bills,
including the following two relevant to renewable energy:
- An Act Concerning Local Representation on the
Connecticut Siting Council
- An Act Concerning Examining the Viability of an
Extended Producer Responsibility Program for Solar Panels
At the February 16 meeting,
the Committee voted, via voice vote, to draft ten concept bills into full
bills, including the following concepts potentially related to renewable
energy:
- An Act Concerning The Implementation Of Certain Climate
Change Measures
- An Act Concerning The Issuance Of Permits By The
Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection
We note that the Committee postponed a vote for one concept bill that may
pertain to renewable energy, An Act Concerning Minor Revisions To
Environment-Related Statutes. This concept was on the agenda for the February
16 meeting.
After the vote, Chair Joseph P. Gresko (D) announced that the Committee will
hold its next meeting on February
23 at 10:00am. This will be the final concept meeting of the
legislative session. An agenda has not been released.
Chair Gresko also announced that the Environment Committee will hold its
first public hearing of the session on February
28 at 10:00am. An Agenda has not been released.
In proceeding on Medium- and Heavy-Duty EV Charging,
Stakeholders file comments urging for more incentives and rate design
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-3, on October 11, 2023, the Connecticut Public Utilities
Regulatory Authority (PURA) issued a Procedural
Order that directed the electric distribution companies (EDCs), Eversource
Energy (Eversource) and the United Illuminating Company (UI), to develop and
submit proposed modification to the following:
- The EDCs’ light duty electric vehicle (EV) supply
equipment (EVSE) tariffs, as necessary to serve medium-and heavy-duty
electric vehicle (MHD EV) fleets;
- Potential MHD EV utility rate designs informed by
Pacific Gas & Electric’s (PG&E’s) rate plans
- Large Power Time-of-day (LTP) for MHD EV fleets to
consist of a blended volumetric time-of-use (TOU) component and a tiered
demand charge structure.
PURA further directed the EDCs to propose a “make-ready incentive structure”
that would allow MHD EV fleet operators to either (listed verbatim):
- Reduce their upfront make-ready costs that would
otherwise be paid for by the connecting customer in the amount of the
expected net incremental revenue associated with the customer’s additional
load due to the MHD EVs; or
- The customer pays the upfront make-ready costs, which
is then returned to the customer in the form of a bill credit over an
amortization period of ten years, up to an amount that does not exceed
incremental revenue from the MHD EVs
The following stakeholders filed comments:
Key comments, organized by issue, are outlined below:
Rate Designs
- CGB encouraged the EDCs to explore strategies, such as
integrating on-site solar and storage technologies, to lower electric
rates, avoid demand charges, and reduce the breakeven timeframe for
electric school bus (ESB) investments for school districts.
- CLF supported the “Scenario 1” MHD EV rate that would
apply a sliding scale for demand charges.
- DEEP recommended that the EDCs either utilize a
synthetic control group (a research design method that evaluates treatment
effect) that would allow them to study potential future impact, or
“develop an alternative scenario that would collect load profile data at
standard rates”.
- OCC argued that rate designs should be flexible to
accommodate shifting peaks due to charging patterns and “mitigate against
contribution to winter peak demand, which could raise costs for all
ratepayers.”
- bp pulse argued that the EDC’s proposed alternative
rate design Scenario 1 mitigates demand charges and encourages off-peak
charging of MHD vehicles.
Incentives
- Capital Clean Cities proposed that programs should
include incentives to help with infrastructure for Class 7 and 8 vehicles,
classified as heavy-duty vehicles, which create the most emissions.
- CGB agreed with the EDCs that the overall project
incentive ($1,300/kW) should be available for “both customer and utility-
side make-ready costs to ensure program marketability and success.”
- CLF supported the EDCs’ make-ready and EV suitability
assessment (EVSA) incentive proposals but noted that the EVSE proposal
should include greater incentives for public fleets.
- DEEP argued that incentives should cover “customer
side” upgrades to gap fill for state or federal funding.
- DEEP suggested that EDCs should consider an “additional
rate structure with tiered rate to provide additional incentives for
fleets located in underserved communities or who operate more than 50% of
miles driven within underserved communities”, as this could incentivize
pollution reduction and the use of public transport in these areas which
tend to be densely populated and have higher amounts of traffic.
- bp pulse recognized that the EDCs MHD make-ready
programs should “extend full incentive eligibility to both public and
private sector fleets and incorporate expedited utility interconnection
and energization processes.”
- Hartford Distributors urged PURA to distribute funds
towards projects to expand charging infrastructure and help transition
vehicle fleets from diesel to electric.
- Connecticut Southwestern Clean Cities Coalition urged
PURA to include Class 7 and Class 8 vehicles in an incentive program due
to the impact that heavy duty vehicles have on air quality.
PURA issues notice of opportunity to comment on use of
consultants in PBR distribution system planning docket, comments due February
27
On February 13, 2024, the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
(PURA) issued
a notice of opportunity to comment on the retention of consultants by PURA in
Docket 21-05-15RE03,
an Investigation into the Establishment of Integrated Distribution System
Planning within a Performance-Based Regulation Framework. In the Notice, PURA
states that it has determined that it is necessary to retain a consultant for
distribution system planning. Docket participants and other stakeholders may
comment on the necessity and desirability of such consulting services through
the PURA
web-filing system or by emailing Pura.ExecutiveSecretary@ct.gov
by February 27, 2024 at
4:00pm.
PURA Announces March 6 Technical Meeting in PBR Distribution
planning docket
On February 14, 2024, the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
(PURA) announced
a technical meeting to be held on March
6, 2024 at 11:00am, in in Docket 21-05-15RE03,
an Investigation into the Establishment of Integrated Distribution System
Planning within a Performance-Based Regulation Framework. At the technical
meeting, PURA plans to discuss the information technology (IT) systems that
support the electric distribution companies (EDCs) system planning processes.
Interested parties may register for the meeting here.
Participants and stakeholders that intend to present at the meeting must send a
list of presenters and an estimated time of presentation to
laura.lupoli@ct.gov, by 4:00pm
on February 28, 2024, and must submit presentations through the
PURA
web filing system by 4:00pm
on March 4, 2024.
Other Connecticut News of Note

- DEEP
issues RFP seeking technical assistance for Microgrid and Resilience
Grant, Climate Pollution Reduction Grant Programs: On February 6, 2024, the
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP)
issued an RFP
seeking technical support in administrating its Microgrid and Resilience
Grant and Climate Pollution Reduction Grant Programs. Bids are due on March 6, 2024 at
4:00pm. Interested parties may direct questions to Katrina.Vallett@ct.gov, or call
860-827-2640.
Back to Headlines
Rhode Island
E3 presents draft analysis in future of gas docket to
stakeholders
As last discussed in NE
Special Flash 24-5.3, on February 6, 2024, in Docket 22-01-NG, Energy +
Environmental Economics (E3) submitted, to the Rhode Island Public Utilities
Commission (PUC), its draft
results of the six scenarios it modeled to explore various roles (or lack
thereof) that the distributed natural gas system could play while Rhode Island
pursues its decarbonization goals. E3 is a consultant to the PUC in his
proceeding. The following graphic summarizes these six scenarios, as well as
their focus areas and guiding research questions:

For each scenario, the deployment of energy efficiency technologies,
weatherization, zero emissions vehicles (ZEVs), clean electricity, and
emissions sinks were held constant, so only electrification and low-carbon fuel
deployment varied. We summarize the key findings from E3’s analysis, as
follows:
- The draft analysis found that all mitigation scenarios
achieve the State’s climate goals, at times even overshooting them.
Specifically, E3 found that all the mitigation scenarios achieved the
state’s 2030 and 2040 emissions reduction goals ahead of schedule in order
to facilitate achievement of longer term goals.
- Annual adoption of decarbonization technologies—namely
heat pumps—needs to increase significantly to support the State’s climate
goals.
- By 2050, 40%-60% of final energy demand is served by
electricity, while the need for renewable fuels varies by case (between
40% and 60%).
- Most modeling scenarios created a winter-peaking grid;
scenarios that allowed for backup (non-electric) heat had reduced electric
system impacts
- A managed transition may avoid pipeline replacements,
but requires significant levels of targeted electrification. E3 found that
such an approach (which is similar to the one adopted by the Massachusetts
Department of Public Utilities (DPU) in Docket 20-80 in its recent Future
of Gas Order, see NE
Flash 24-4) could achieve substantial cost savings, as much as $150
million/year compared to an unmanaged transition.
- Rhode Island is expected to see increased use of
biofuels through Biodiesel
Heating Act. By 2050, ~50-70% of the fuel mix across scenarios
consists of renewable fuels, with the largest reliance in Continued Use of
Gas scenario, and the least reliance in the high electrification use case.
- Except for the Continued Use of Gas scenario, all
mitigation scenarios lead to untenable long-term gas delivery rates due to
a combination of increased gas system costs and throughput decline. E3
noted that this effect mostly starts to materialize post-2035. We note
that a similar effect was observed and has been discussed in
Massachusetts’ Clean Heat Standard proceeding (as discussed in NE
Flash 23-24).
- Electric cost of service increases are largely offset
by increased loads, especially for scenarios with high load factors (aka,
scenarios in which electrification does no result in un-managed peak
loads). The cost of service increases can be viewed (in NPV terms between
2023 and 2050) on Slide 17. Perhaps most noteworthy is the fact that the
cost of service rates for the Continued Use of Gas case are substantially
higher than the costs associated with the electrification cases. In a
Reference Scenario, achieving the 100% Renewable Energy Standard increased
rates by 1.3-2.3¢/kWh by 2035.
E3 also provided a link to its spreadsheet
containing its input assumptions. Overall, E3’s analysis found significant
out-year costs and risks for ratepayers in continuing to maintain the gas
system at its current scale, and that gas system strategies that prioritize
electrification (likely in a staged/managed transition to electrification)
would have lower costs for ratepayers. Given the PUC’s mainly ratepayer-focused
approach, these results suggest that future gas system strategies the PUC
approves will require Rhode Island Energy to engage in substantial
electrification to meet Act on Climate targets, and (similar to Massachusetts)
a declining degree of investment into the existing gas system.
RI Energy files 2024-2026 System Reliability Procurement
Investment Proposal for Demand Response; recommends new EV Demand Response
program
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-6, on February 8, 2024, in Docket
No. 24-06-EE, Rhode Island Energy (RI Energy) filed its 2024-2026 System
Reliability Procurement Investment Proposal for Electric Demand Response.
As discussed in NE
Flash 23-5, the System Reliability Procurement (SRP) program allows RI
Energy to solicit third-party solutions to solve grid needs, as an alternative
to traditional, RI Energy-owned poles and wires solutions. SRP includes
programs to achieve these goals, notably, incentives for consumers to shift
demand (e.g., ConnectedSolutions).
The chart below details RI Energy’s projected SRP budget, projected
benefits, and proposed performance incentives for calendar years
2024-2026.

RI Energy suggested recovering ConnectedSolutions’ programmatic costs
through an SRP factor of $0.00224/kWh for the months of June – December 2024,
to be updated in subsequent years.
RI Energy also proposed the below changes to ConnectedSolutions’
programmatic offerings.
Electric Vehicle
Demand Response (EVDR)
RI Energy proposed an EVDR pathway through which it will incentivize
residential and small business customers to curtail electric vehicle (EV)
charging during peak demand periods. Participants would be eligible for a $50
upfront incentive and a $20/season participation incentive. RI Energy suggested
targeting 500 participants in 2024, an additional 750 participants in 2025, and
another 1,000 new participants in 2026.
RI Energy drew comparisons between the EVDR pathway and its former Smart
Charge RI program, which likewise incented participants for charging during
off-peak windows. RI Energy noted that while Smart Charge RI employed a
“behavioral (or passive)” approach by “incentiviz[ing] and nudg[ing] desired
charge schedules,” EVDR would “actively manage[]” such loads by “remotely
curtailing charge hours.”
RI Energy noted that it “anticipates” that its forthcoming proposal for
Phase II of its Electric Transportation Initiative will include an “expanded
off-peak charging rebate pilot.” Participants could participate only in the
EVDR pathway or the off-peak charging rebate program.
Bring Your Own
Thermostat (BYOT)
The BYOT program incents participants to curtail their electric demand
during the annual system peak hour and other “high peak days” in June through
September. Noting that this pathway carries the second-lowest cost for peak
demand reduction, RI Energy proposed increasing the upfront enrollment
incentive from $25 to $50.
Targeted Dispatch and
Daily Dispatch
The Targeted Dispatch and Daily Dispatch pathways are pay-for-performance
incentive programs available to commercial & industrial (C&I)
customers. Participants are incented to curtail their electric demand during
the annual system peak hour, as well as other high (both pathways) and medium
(Daily Dispatch pathway only) peak days in June through September. RI Energy
proposed reducing the incentive level for the Targeted Dispatch pathway from
$40/kW to $35/kW, and from $300/kW to $275/kW for the Daily Dispatch pathway.
RI Energy also suggested an aggregated annual per-customer cap of $1,000,000
across both pathways.
Residential and Small
Business (RSB) Battery Pathway
RSB Battery pathway participants receive an incentive based on the annual
performance of their battery energy storage system (BESS) discharge during peak
events. Citing a desire to lower the cost associated with procuring a unit of
peak demand “more in line with the Company’s willingness to pay,” RI Energy
proposed that participants who enroll by June 1 receive a $400/kW multiyear
incentive, and those who enroll later receive a $225/kW multiyear incentive. RI
Energy suggested that participants who reach the end of the “five-year
incentive lock” receive a reduced $200/kW incentive. Additionally, RI Energy
proposed transitioning from a “five-year rate lock” to a “multiyear incentive
rate” (i.e., subject to change) to “provide due transparency about possible variations
in expected revenues.”
House Finance Committee to hold budget meeting at which it
will discus EV charging funding
On March 6, 2024, at 4:00 pm ET, in Room 35 of the State House, the Rhode
Island House Finance Committee will hold a budget appropriations meeting (agenda),
and will discuss H.
7225 – An Act Making Appropriations For The Support Of The State For The Fiscal
Year Ending June 30, 2025 (the 2025 state budget) Article 2 Section 9
allocating funding for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and maintenance
infrastructure. The meeting can be streamed live here.
RI Energy files revised schedules for potential 2024-2026
REG program tariff and rule changes
As discussed in NE
Flash 23-48, on November 15, 2023, in Docket
23-44-REG, the proceeding in which the Rhode Island Public Utilities
Commission (PUC) is reviewing the 2024 Renewable Energy Growth (REG) program,
Rhode Island Energy (RI Energy) filed its Renewable
Energy Growth Tariff and Enrollment Rule Changes for Program Year 2024. RI
Energy’s proposed tariff changes, broadly speaking, proposed several amendments
to the program, which were necessitated by or second-order effects from Chapter
300 and 301 – An Act Relative to Public Utilities and Carriers – Net Metering.
On January 29, 2024, RI Energy filed Revised
schedules including a revised tariff. Revisions relative to the November
filing are highlighted. The revisions contain details regarding the process by
which projects can certify that they are not located on core forest or are
located on a preferred site, including updated definitions relating to core
forests. In addition, the revisions simplify language associated with triggers
for the revision of future year prices if interest rates, total project costs,
and/or state/federal law change significantly.
Other Rhode Island News of Note
- DEM
to host public comment period on SouthCoast Wind 1 project dredge on
February 22, comment period end on March 7: On February 7, 2024,
the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Office of
Customer and Technical Assistance (OCTA) announced that is has scheduled a
Public
Comment Hearing on February 22,
2024, to discuss a Dredge Permit Application submitted
by SouthCoast Wind Energy LLC. The Permit application seeks
approval for proposing dredging permit in the Sakonnet River and Mount
Hope Bay in Portsmouth. Written comments are due at 4 pm on March 7, 2024.
- Climate
Justice roundtable with OER February 28: On February 28, 2024,
the Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources (OER), Department of
Environmental Management (DEM), and Racial and Environmental Justice
Committee will host a Climate Justice Hour on energy efficiency and
weatherization. Registration is free, and the remote event can be found here.
- Executive
Climate Change Coordinating Council hosts meeting February 21: On February 21, 2024, at
2:30 PM, at 235 Promenade Street, Room 300, Providence, and remotely,
the Executive Climate Change Coordinating Council (EC4) will host a
meeting (agenda)
at which the Chair of the RI
Green Buildings Advisory Committee will give a presentation, priority
Climate Action Plan GHG reduction measures will be discussed, and the EC4
Science and Technical Advisory Board (STAB) will present updates.
Back to Headlines
Maine
PUC initiates Rulemaking for proposed RFP for Class IA
projects equal to 5% of load, with preference for projects on contaminated
land; PUC to issue RFP within three months of adopting proposed rules
On February 13, 2024, at the stakeholder meeting
in Docket 2024-00028,
(discussed in NE
Special Flash 24-5.3), the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) issued a
Notice
of Rulemaking and Proposed
Procurement for Renewable Resources with a Preference for Projects Located on
Contaminated Land. As discussed in NE
Special Flash 23-25.2, on June 26, 2023, Governor Janet Mills
(D) signed into
law Chapter 321 of 2023,
which required that the PUC issue a solicitation by January 1, 2024, for energy
and RECs from Class IA renewable projects equal to 5% of retail load, plus any
amount contracted under previous Class IA procurements that the PUC expects not
to be fulfilled. Though the PUC’s deadline for issuing the solicitation has
already passed, the PUC has not yet approved the terms of the solicitation.
Contracts are allowed to have up to a 20-year term, unless the PUC determines
that a longer contract would be in the public interest.
As proposed in the PUC Rulemaking, bid requirements would include:
- Projects must have reached commercial operation after
September 19, 2023, and have the system impact studies initiated.
- Developers can include bids paired with energy storage
but must submit bids both with and without the energy storage project.
- Bidders must demonstrate that the project will provide
economic and community benefits, including job creation, goods and
services that will be purchased, and excise, income, property, and sales
taxes that will be paid.
The PUC proposed that it will consider the following during its bid
evaluation:
- The PUC must determine that a project’s forecasted
market value be higher than the project’s contract costs to be considered.
- The PUC will consider how the proposed projects will
affect congestion and curtailment of other renewable projects.
- The PUC will give “primary preference” to projects
located on contaminated land, meaning “agricultural land, contaminated by
perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances [PFAs, …] that may no longer
be used for its current or historical agricultural purposes.”
- The PUC will give “secondary Preference” to projects
that minimize use of forested land and farmland that is not contaminated
land.
- Economic benefits will be a tiebreaker for bids that
would otherwise have the same score.
The PUC must issue the solicitation within three months of adopting the
proposed solicitation rules. If the PUC does not procure all the energy and
RECs that it is required to procure, then it will issue a subsequent
procurement for remaining RECs and energy within one year of concluding the
first solicitation, and will continue to do so until it has approved contacts
for the full statutorily required quantity.
The PUC noted that it will include more specific process deadlines when it
issues the RFP(s).
PUC grants in part CMP request for six-month waiver from
site-visit timeline requirements for Level 1 and 2 interconnection applications
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-3, on January 9, 2023, in Docket 2024-00013,
Central Maine Power Company (CMP) filed a Petition,
with the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC), requesting a six-month waiver
of certain Chapter 324 interconnection timeline requirements. Specifically, the
Petition requested a waiver from Section 16 of Chapter 324, which requires that
CMP perform site visits on all Level 1 and Level 2 Projects within ten business
days of a project passing all applicable screens and prior to executing a
project’s interconnection application (IA). In its Petition, CMP explained that
it is seeking the wavier to “implement a process and acquire sufficient
resources and personnel able to complete this new Chapter 324 requirement
within the time period provided.”
On February 8, 2024, the PUC issued an Order
approving the request. In the Order, the PUC found that good cause existed to
grant the requested waiver to the extent that CMP can determine without a site
visit that distribution upgrades for projects will not exceed the thresholds
for which projects will be required to fund system upgrades beyond the fixed
fee established by the PUC (see coverage of Order
adopting fixed fee in NE Flash 23-45).
However, the PUC found that for Level 1 and Level 2 projects that will be
assigned upgrade costs beyond the fixed fee, and for whom CMP needs to perform
a site visit in order to determine the extent of those upgrade costs, CMP is
still required to comply with the requirements.
CMP files revised NEB Application form including
requirements that Tariff Rate applications collocate with offtakers
On February 7, 2024, in Docket 2024-00030, Central Maine Power Company (CMP) filed, with
the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC), a Revised
Net Energy Billing Application form. The revised application includes
requirements that Tariff Rate applications verify that all subscribers are
collocated with facility, per the requirements of Chapter
411.
DEP methodology for calculating gross and net annual GHG
emissions for State GHG reduction targets take effect
On February 6, 2024, the Final
Rule that the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) created
for
Chapter 167: Tracking and Reporting Gross and Net Annual Greenhouse Gas
Emissions took effect. As discussed in NE
Flash 90.1, the Rule establishes methods for the calculation of annual
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as required by 38 M.R.S. § 576-A, which called
for the DEP to adopt rules to track gross and net GHG emissions. Pursuant to Chapter
476 of 2019, the State is required to reduce carbon emissions by 45%
relative to 1990 by 2030 and 80% by 2050, with interim targets to be met in
2040 to demonstrate that the goal will be achieved. We note the Chapter 167
Rulemaking lists its target as carbon neutrality by 2045, but does not include
any interim targets.
Under the Rule, DEP will calculate gross and net carbon emissions using
direct facility emissions reporting, the Environmental Protection Agency’s
State Inventory Tool, biogenic emissions, energy consumption data, and economic
data. Chapter 167 requires DEP to issue a report on its gross greenhouse gas
emissions analysis every two years.
For net greenhouse gas analysis, Chapter 167 requires DEP to calculate the
difference between GHG emissions and sequestration from fossil fuels, waste,
forests, wood products, wetlands, agriculture, urban biomass and soils, inland
waters, and coastal waters.
EUT Committee schedules public hearing for whole-home heat
pump bill on February 22; work session to discuss performance-based ratemaking
and competitive electric supplier legislation same day

As discussed in NE
Special Flash 24-6.2, the Maine Legislature’s Joint Energy, Utilities, and
Technology (EUT) Committee has scheduled a public hearing for February 22, 2024 to receive testimony
on LD 2206 – An Act Regarding Incentives
for Heat Pumps and Other Weatherization Products and Services.
The hearing will commence at 1:15 pm. and will be livestreamed here.
If enacted, this bill would amend Sec. 1.
35-A MRSA §10119, sub-§2, ¶C, regarding the Heating Fuels Efficiency and
Weatherization Fund and the development of a heating fuel efficiency and
weatherization incentive program by the Efficiency Maine Trust (the Trust). The
bill would prohibit the Trust from requiring that a consumer disconnect their
existing primary heating equipment powered by heating fuel in order to receive
an incentive under this type of program.
As discussed in NE
Special Flash 24-5.3, the EUT Committee was scheduled to discuss LD 2163 – An Act to Require
Electricity Providers to Inform Customers of Alternative Electric Rates and
Gather Consent Prior to Contract Renewal and LD 2172 – An Act to Enhance Electric
Utility Performance-based Ratemaking during a work session
on February 15. Both bills were ultimately tabled, and have been rescheduled for a work session on
February 22 at 2:00 pm. The meeting will be livestreamed here.
The EUT Committee was likewise slated to discuss LD 2077 – An Act Regarding Customer
Costs and the Environmental and Health Effects of Natural Gas during
a February 15 work session. That session was ultimately cancelled, and the bill
has not yet been rescheduled.
Governor Mills introduces supplemental budget proposal;
proposes $1.5M for Renewable Energy Facilities Property Tax Exemption Program
and $5M to support municipalities’ and tribes’ climate planning and actions,
including clean energy projects; public hearings scheduled for week of February
20

On February 14, 2024, Governor Janet Mills (D) introduced
a supplemental budget proposal, LD 2214 – An Act to Make
Supplemental Appropriations and Allocations for the Expenditures of State
Government, General Fund and Other Funds and to Change Certain Provisions of
the Law Necessary to the Proper Operations of State Government for the Fiscal
Years Ending June 30, 2024 and June 30, 2025. The proposed
supplemental budget includes
$1.5M for the Renewable Energy Facilities Property Tax Exemption Program and
$5M to support municipalities’ and tribes’ climate planning and actions,
including clean energy projects.
The Joint Committee
on Appropriations and Financial Affairs (AFA) has scheduled the legislation for a series of
public hearings throughout the week of February 20:
- 1:30 pm with the Joint
Committee on Education and Cultural Affairs
- 1:30 pm with the Joint
Committee on Innovation, Development, Economic Advancement and Business
- 2:30 pm with the Joint
Committee on Taxation
- 1:00 pm with the Joint
Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs
- 2:00 pm with the Joint
Committee on Housing
All hearings will be in Room 228 of the State House and will be livestreamed
here.
We will provide additional information on the provisions relevant to renewable
energy in a forthcoming flash update.
Stakeholders file comments on Efficiency Maine Trust’s
Electric Efficiency and Conservation Programs rulemaking
During the week of February 5, 2024, Efficiency Maine Trust (the Trust)
posted stakeholder comments
on proposed amendments to Chapter
3 of its rules,
which governs the implementation of the Trust’s Electric Efficiency and
Conservation Programs. As most recently discussed in NE
Flash 24-3, these amendments reflect changes required by P.L. 2023, ch.
328, An
Act to Enact the Beneficial Electrification Policy Act (summarized
in NE
Special Flash 23-25.2). A detailed summary of the proposed amendments is
available in NE
Flash 23-48.
The following stakeholders submitted comments:
CLF encouraged the Trust to adopt rules that would expand participation in
Trust programs, by allocating 40 percent, rather than the current 10 percent,
of program funds to low income residential consumers, and to expand the
definition of “low income” to align with the definition of “disadvantaged
communities” in the Biden Administration’s Justice40
initiative (a provision of a 2021 executive
order setting the goal that 40% of the benefits of certain Federal
investments be directed towards disadvantaged communities). CLF encouraged the
Trust to include the goal of 55% of heavy-duty vehicle sales be zero-emission
by 2030, and to dedicate 40% of electric vehicle (EV) funding to disadvantaged
communities. CLF also encouraged the Trust to loosen its cost effectiveness
tests such that more programs would qualify as cost effective. CLF suggested
expanding the number of programs that the Trust exempts from its
cost-effectiveness test by expanding its “Non-Quantifiable Cost Effectiveness”
criteria, and encouraged the Trust to consider only gross efficiency savings,
rather than net efficiency savings, while evaluating efficiency programs in its
Triennial Plan.
NRCM voiced “strong support” for the proposed rule, especially the inclusion
of beneficial electrification in the Trust’s scope. NRCM differed from CLF by
calling the proposed rule to include net cost savings as a practical and
important modification of the Trust’s current practice, because it more closely
reflects the real cost savings felt by consumers who make energy efficiency
investments.
Governor Janet Mills signs Executive Order establishing
green building standards for government buildings
On January 12, 2024, Maine Governor Janet Mills signed an Executive
Order that established new green building standards for government
buildings in the State. This Executive Order aligns with Maine’s climate goals
of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. The Order notes that, as heat, cooling,
and lighting of buildings contribute to nearly one-third of Maine’s greenhouse
gas emissions, modernizing buildings to utilize clean energy and enhance energy
efficiency is important to meeting the State’s climate goals. Key portions of
the Executive Order related to new green building standards are outlined below
(verbatim):
- The Bureau of General Services (BGS) requires that all
new state-owned buildings must be designed and built without fossil fuels
for heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), or water heating.
- BGS requires that all new construction must be designed
and built to the adopted state stretch code under the Maine Uniform
Building and Energy Code (MUBEC). If a stretch code has not been adopted
at the time of construction, then a new construction will be designed and
built to the adopted base code under MUBEC.
- Effective July 1, 2024, BGS will require that all new
construction, significantly renovated buildings, and other public
improvements which involve significant parking lot improvements include
infrastructure readiness measures for future electric vehicle charging
installation.
- By December 31, 2024, BGS intends to develop a plan to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50% from existing state owned
buildings, while achieving at least a 25% energy use intensity reduction
across the state owned building portfolio, based on a 2020 baseline,
within 10 years of the Executive Order.
PUC issues Procedural Order confirming $5/MWh Class II ACP
will be in effect for Compliance Year 2023
As discussed in NE
Flash 23-44, on November 1, 2023, in Docket
2023-00225, the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) issued an Order in
which it amended the RPS to
establish a Class II RPS Alternative Compliance Payment (ACP) rate of $5/MWh.
The PUC issued the Order pursuant to Chapter 361 of 2023(discussed
in NE
Flash 23-27), which directed the PUC to create a Class II ACP no
greater than $10/MWh. On February 8, 2024, the PUC issued a Procedural
Order, confirming that the new ACP value took effect on December 2, 2023,
and will be the applicable ACP value for Compliance Year 2023.
PUC issues Report re: Methods to Educate Customers on
Electricity Supply; Concludes including cost per kWh for each power source on
disclosure labels not feasible
On February 12, 2024, Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) submitted, to
the Maine Legislature’s Joint Standing Committee on Energy, Utilities and
Technology (EUT Committee), a Report
regarding Methods to Educate Customers about Electricity Supply. On May 8,
2023, Governor Janet Mills signed LD 69 – Resolve, to
Direct the Public Utilities Commission to Consider Methods to Educate Customers
About Electricity Supply d which became Resolve
2023, Chapter 12 (as discussed in NE
Special Flash 23-25.2). This Resolve required that the PUC to issue a
request for information (RFI) to competitive electricity providers and
standard-offer service providers (“providers”) seeking the following
information: 1) whether it is feasible for providers to share with transmission
and distribution utilities a ¢/kWh cost for each power source used to serve
load, to be included on residential and small nonresidential consumer
disclosure labels; and 2) whether it is feasible for providers to calculate the
levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for each power source.
The PUC issued the RFI on November 2, 2023, in Docket 2023-00291. The Report
summarizes stakeholders’ comments on the RFI. According to the summary of
stakeholder comments in the Report, Constellation
Energy Services (Constellation) and NRG
Retail Companies (NRG) asserted that it is not feasible to include the cost
of generation, in cents per kilowatt-hour from generation, because competitive
electricity providers (CEPs) source supply from the wholesale electricity
markets in which the suppliers are unable to tie purchases to specific
generation sources. NRG suggested that the PUC (i) provide more robust
consumer education materials on PUC’s website, (ii) allow CEPs to bill
consumers directly (rather than on the T&D utilities’ bills), (iii) make
Time-of-Use (TOU) rates the default rate, and (iv) require T&D utilities
using smart meters to provide more transparency on energy usage data to
consumers. Central
Maine Power Company (CMP) and Versant
Power (Versant) asserted that providing a generation cost breakdown would
be beneficial to consumers, because consumers pay more attention to the total
amount of energy bill.
The PUC concluded that it will continue to engage with the EUT Committee and
stakeholders on more options to educate consumers about electricity supply
options and costs. The Report also discloses that PUC has engaged a
marketing/public relations firm to develop a public outreach plan for 2024,
which will include communications on electricity rates with consumers.
Other Maine News of Note
- Oxford
Selectman grant tax rebate to solar project; Consider moratorium on
renewable energy projects: On February 1, 2024, the Board of Selectmen of Oxford,
ME held a meeting
which included the discussion of property tax rebate for Oxford Solar 1
project. The project company Oxford Solar 1, LLC requested $62,675 for
property tax rebate because the project is exempt from property tax based
on State statute. The Board approved the abatement. In the meeting
minute, the Board requested the Town Manager provide the Board more
information regarding Solar Moratoriums. On February 15, 2024, the
Selectmen of Oxford held another meeting,
the agenda for which included further discussion of establishing solar
moratorium.
- Maine
Fishermen’s Forum to include day-long offshore wind seminar on February
29: On
February 29, 2024, the Maine
Fishermen’s Forum, being held in Rockport, ME, will include an all-day
Offshore
Wind Seminar. The Seminar agenda include the following panels: an
update on Maine’s Offshore Wind Research Consortium, discussion on federal
offshore leasing process and compliance, and discussion of floating
offshore wind technology. Representatives from the Governor’s Energy
Office (GEO), the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the Bureau of
Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) are expected to be in
attendance.
- Governor
Mills announces $6.5 million in grant awards to support electrical grid
upgrades for Maine businesses through Maine Jobs & Recovery Plan: On February 12, 2024,
Governor Janet Mills announced
$6.5 million grants were awarded through the Maine
Jobs and Recovery Plan. The grants were aimed to upgrade electric grid
for rural Maine businesses, increase efficiency and reliability of
electricity supplies, and create job opportunities. The Program is an
initiative of the Maine Department of Economic and Community Development
(DECD) and the Governor’s Energy Office (GEO) and is administered by the
Maine Technology Institute (MTI). Six Maine companies from food
production, manufacturing and forestry industries were awarded
grants.
Back to Headlines
New Hampshire
Burgess BioPower files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy,
terminating contract with Eversource; reportedly intends to continue operation
through bankruptcy process
According to New Hampshire Public Radio, during the week ending February 9,
2024, the 75 MW Burgess
Biopower facility (Burgess) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and terminated
its contract with Eversource Energy (Eversource). As discussed in NE
Flash 23-43, on October 26, 2023, the New Hampshire Legislature’s vote to
override the veto of HB142 – An Act Relative to the
Operation of the Burgess Biopower Plant failed by a
margin of 194-159 (236
needed to override). If enacted, this bill would have provided relief to
Burgess by addressing the treatment of funds in excess of the cumulative
reduction factor (CRF) that was established in the original PPA between Burgess
and Eversource (discussed in NE
Special Flash 23-12.1). When the contracted price Eversource pays for
energy under the PPA, exceeds the wholesale market price (the Cumulative
Factor), a credit (the Cumulative Reduction) is created for “the future benefit
of Eversource.” This bill would have exempted Burgess Biopower from repaying
CRF funds in excess of $150 million that accrued during a suspension of the cap
on the CRF. As discussed in NE
Flash 23-44, if Burgess needed to repay the CRF funds, Sustainable Energy
Advantage’s research and analysis suggested that it was likely that Burgess
would file for Chapter 11 or Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Burgess has claimed that it will continue generating through the bankruptcy
process. We note that until Vineyard Wind I becomes fully operational, Burgess
is remains the largest REC producer in New England, and is certified as a Class
I resource in Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maine, and New Hampshire, so its
closure would significantly reduce REC supply in New England REC markets.
Sustainable Energy Advantage issues analyses of the New England REC market on
an ongoing basis as part of SEA’s New England Renewable
Energy Market Outlook, including analysis of how project shutdowns could
affect REC prices. For more information, please contact Sustainable Energy
Advantage’s Po-Yu Yuen.
New Hampshire Senate votes to pass bills relating to EV
Study Commission, property tax exemptions for grid-scale generators; House
kills bill that would ban state EV purchases, two bills that would regulate
EBikes, and bill that would require solar canopies over large parking lots
On February 8, 2024, the House and Senate chambers of the New Hampshire
General Court held general sessions during which they took actions on several
bills related to renewable energy. We list those bills, organized by
legislative action, below.
Passed (As Amended)
SB430 – An Act Relative to
Establishing a Commission to Study the Impacts of Electric Vehicles,
lithium-Ion Batteries, and E-Mobility Devices on First Responder Response, the
Environment, Building and Fire Codes, and Life and Safety Property Protection (recording
available here).
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-3, if enacted, this bill would establish a commission to study the
impacts of electric vehicles (EVs), lithium-ion batteries, and e-mobility
devices, characterized
by the U.S. Department of Transportation as light, medium, and
heavy-duty electric vehicles, electric micromobility devices such as scooters
and e-bikes, and transit vehicles, on the following:
- First responder response, training, and protective
equipment
- Built and natural environment
- Building and fire codes
- Life safety
- Property protection
- Transportation system
This bill was passed via voice vote.
SB584 – Relative to the application of
the utility property tax to certain renewable electric generating facilities,
and relative to communications services tax revenues. If
enacted, this bill would:
- Amend RSA
72:74 to exempt energy facilities as defined in RSA
362:4-c (i.e., wholesale electric providers and any generation
facility that receives a certificate as an energy facility for the New
Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee) from the utility property tax.
- These exempt electric
generation facilities would be required to file an annual form which
collects information identifying electric distribution company
(EDC) and non-EDC property and decide which assets are and are not
subject to the utility property tax.
- Provide that any generation facility that is exempt
from the utility property tax and is making payments in lieu of taxes
(PILOT) to a municipality (as of January 1, 2025), would be exempt from
payment of the state education tax until its PILOT agreement expires or
until January 1, 2030, whichever comes first.
We note that the original version of the bill would have amended RSA
198:39 to require 50% of the annual revenues collected from the
Communications Service Tax to be sent to the Education Trust Fund. This
provision was removed from the version of the bill advanced by the Senate on
February 8.
This bill was passed via voice vote.
Approved for Interim
Study
HB1333 – An Act relative to
prohibiting state agencies from buying or leasing electric vehicles for 10
years.
If enacted, this bill would have placed a 10-year moratorium on
state rentals, leases, and purchases of electric, plug-in hybrid, and hybrid
vehicles.
We note that because the New Hampshire General Court is in the second year
of its two-year session, a referral to interim study effectively kills the
bill.
Voted Inexpedient to
Legislate
HB1445 – Relative to electric
bicycles, electric scooters, and electric unicycles. As discussed in NE
Flash 24-6, on
January 30, 2024, the House Transportation Committee reported HB1445 as
inexpedient to legislate (ITL). If enacted, the bill would have repealed RSA
265:144-a and reenacted it to read that any class of electric bicycle
capable of speeds 15 miles per hour is faster (with assistance of electric
motor and battery power) shall:
- Not be operated on any sidewalk, bike path, or rail
trail
- Be subject to all motor vehicle laws, rules, and
regulations while being operated on a public roadway
- If required under RSA
261, be registered with the New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles.
The bill would have also required headlights, tail lights, brake lights, and
speedometers for all classes of electric bicycles, and redefined “electric
scooter” and “electric unicycle” in state statute.
HB1543 – Relative to personal electric
vehicles (PEVs). As
discussed in NE
Flash 24-6, on
January 30, 2024, the House Transportation Committee reported HB1445 as ITL. If
enacted, this bill would have amended RSA
259 by redefining “Personal Electric Vehicle” (PEV) to include any
electric motor-driven vehicle where the motor exceeds 1.0 horsepower, excluding
electric bicycles. The bill would have prohibited anyone from operating a PEV
over 5 mph on sidewalks, walkways, or walking trails, and over 15 mph on
public rail trails, public hiking trails, and public bicycle trails.The bill
would have redefined “Electric bicycle” as “a pedaled vehicle equipped with an
electric motor of less than 750 watts.”
HB1641 – An Act Relating to Requiring
Large Parking Lots To Have A Solar Power Canopy. As
discussed in NE
Flash 24-4, on January 24, 2024, the House Municipal and County Government
Committee reported HB1641 as ITL. If enacted, the bill would have
required parking lot owners to install solar canopies over lots with 80 to 400
spaces by 2030, and parking lots exceeding 400 spaces by 2028.
The ITPs were all approved via voice vote.
New Hampshire House Committees votes to pass bills relating
to filing integrated distribution plans, review and adapt regulations for
nuclear energy development, making nuclear energy generated after September 1,
2024 a Class I resource, and prohibiting EVs from parking in parking garages;
House kills bills relating to cars parking in EV-designated parking spots and
establishing a commissions to study barriers to EV adoption
Between February 13 and 20, 2024, several Committees of the New Hampshire
House of Representatives hosted sessions during which they heard testimony on
and/or considered bills related to renewable energy. We list the bills along
with any Committee reports, organized by the date and time of each session,
below:
Tuesday, February 13,
2024
The New Hampshire House Science, Technology and Energy (STE) Committee held
a Work
Session and Executive
Session on the following bills:
The Committee voted Ought to Pass with Amendment. This amendment would amend
RSA
378:38, III-VI and would include an assessment of distribution
infrastructure, potential non-wires solutions, and the plan’s integration and
consistency with the state energy strategy, and RSA
378:39-378:40 which would require every gas public utility to file an
integrated gas distribution plan and undergo a review from the commission.
- HB1465 – An Act Relative to
Studies of Nuclear Energy Technologies. As last
discussed in NE
Flash 24-5, if enacted, this bill would amend and update RSA
162-B, a 1955 statute that originally directed several New Hampshire
State agencies to review and adapt regulations to support development of
nuclear energy. The bill would require the New Hampshire Department of
Energy (DOE) to coordinate studies by State agencies on the use and
development of nuclear energy, including advanced nuclear reactors. The
bill would also assign the commissioner of DOE as an advisor to the
Governor on nuclear energy development and legally adopt the federal
government’s definition of “advanced nuclear.”
The Majority Committee voted Ought to Pass with Amendment, while the
Minority Committee voted Inexpedient to Legislate. This amendment would amend RSA
162-B:3 which would require continuing studies by state agencies, RSA
162-B:4 which would establish a position to assist the commissioner of the
department of energy, RSA
12-0:51 which would rename the office of offshore wind industry development
to the office energy innovation, and rename the bill to An Act Relative to
Studies of Nuclear Energy Technologies and Renaming the Office of Offshore Wind
Industry Development.
- HB1644 – An Act Including Energy
Produced by Any Nuclear-Powered Generating Facility as a Class I Form of
Electric Renewable Energy. If enacted, this bill
would amend RSA
362-F:4, which concerns the classes of the RPS, to make electricity
produced by nuclear generation facilities commencing operation after
September 1, 2024, eligible as a Class I resource. We note that this bill
summary represents a non-germane amendment to the bill adopted during the
Executive Session in a bipartisan (19-1) vote. As last discussed in NE
Flash 24-5, if enacted as first introduced, the bill would require DOE
to open a proceeding and conduct an investigation of the benefits and key
considerations regarding support for clean or non-carbon emitting power
generation, including nuclear generation, and report it to the New
Hampshire General Court within one year.
The Committee voted Ought to Pass with Amendment.
The New Hampshire House Transportation Committee held an Executive
Session on the following bills:
The Committee voted Ought to Pass.
- HB1416 – An Act Relative to
Prohibiting Parking of Non-Electric Vehicles in Spaces Designated for
Charging Electric Vehicles. If enacted,
this bill would amend RSA
265:69 by prohibiting the parking of non-electric vehicles in public
or private parking spaces which are specifically designated for the
charging of EVs. The spots will be reserved for EVs “while charging,”
where “while charging” means waiting for charging equipment to become
available, preparing the vehicle or charging station for the charging
session, charging the vehicle, and completing the charging session. Any
non-EV violating this provision would be subject to a $100 fine, with 50%
of the fine payable to the town or city in which the violation occurred.
Submission of clear photographic evidence and testimony under oath,
submitted by an owner or operator of an EV, owner or operator of the
charging station, that a vehicle was violating this provision, would be
sufficient evidence to prove that the vehicle owner is subject to the
fine.
The Committee voted Inexpedient to Legislate.
Wednesday, February
14, 2024
The New Hampshire House Public Works and Highways held an Executive
Session on the following bill:
The Committee voted Inexpedient to Legislate by a margin of 12-6.
House Executive Departments and Administration Committee
holds Feb 13 Public Hearing on Bill to update the New Hampshire Building Code;
Nongovernmental Organizations support, construction industry and Building Code
Review Board oppose amendment that would also update Energy Code
On Tuesday, February 13, New Hampshire House of Representatives’ Executive
Departments and Administration Committee held a Public
Hearing on HB1059 – An Act Relative to the State
Building Code. If enacted, this bill would amend RSA
155-A, which concerns the New Hampshire Building Code, to adopt the
2021 editions of the
International Building Code, International
Existing Building Code, International
Plumbing Code, International
Mechanical Code, International
Swimming Pool and Spa Code, and International
Residential Code. New Hampshire currently uses the 2018 editions. The bill
would also adopt all amendments
reviewed and approved by the New Hampshire Building Code Review Board (BCRB) as
of September 8, 2023. Notably, the bill as filed would not mandate the adoption
of the 2021
Energy Conservation Code, but instead retains the existing 2018 energy
code. We note that this is the counterpart to SB373 – An Act Relative to the State
Building Code (last discussed in NE
Flash 24-6).
At the hearing, Committee Chair Carol McGuire (R) presented an amendment to
the bill that would update the state energy code for commercial and industrial
buildings to match the 2021 edition of the International Energy Conservation
Code. Rep. McGuire noted that although she personally opposes updating the
energy code, she prefers that the Committee debate and vote on the amendment.
The amendment text has not yet been released, and hearing testimony was
contradictory as to whether the proposed amendment would update energy code for
all buildings, or for commercial buildings only.
Rep. Rebecca McWilliams (D) testified in favor of the amendment, arguing
that when large commercial facilities aren’t required to conduct energy audits,
the costs of excessive energy use will be passed on to ratepayers through
increased grid infrastructure costs.
Phillip Sherman, the Chair of Building Code Review Board (BCRB) testified in
favor of the original bill without amendment. Sherman noted that the BCRB
decided against recommending adoption of the 2021 energy code by a 9-4 vote.
Upon questioning, Sherman clarified that most of the controversy surrounding
the 2021 energy code centered on changes to the residential code.
The Sierra Club testified in opposition to the bill as introduced,
supporting the amendment that would update the energy code. The Sierra Club
highlighted energy cost savings associated with 2021 energy code updates, and
encouraged adoption of energy codes that reflect recent advances in heating and
cooling technology.
The New Hampshire Fire Marshal’s Office testified in support of the bill as
written, but noted that it is open to discussing adoption of the 2021 energy
code.
The New Hampshire Homebuilders Association (NHHA) testified in opposition to
updating any statewide building codes, with a strong opposition to the
amendment that would update the energy code. NHHA cited a study
commissioned by the National Association of Homebuilders which found that the
2021 energy code would increase up-front construction costs for a single-family
home by $31,000, increasing monthly mortgage payments by $206, adding up to
$75,000 over a 30-year mortgage at current rates, dwarfing savings on energy
costs. NHHA further voiced concerns that the increased costs would drive
middle-class homebuyers away from New Hampshire, and that airtight houses face
increased risk of mold and mildew. NHHA noted that it is more concerned about
costs facing homeowners than those facing commercial facilities.
The Associated General Contractors of New Hampshire (AGCNH), which
represents commercial contractors, testified in support of the bill as written,
opposing the amendment that would update the energy code. AGCNH argued that the
energy code is not related to safety or structural integrity of buildings, and
that the costs of implementing the energy code would burden property owners and
renters, including affordable housing residents. AGCNH noted further that the
2021 energy code was written before recent increases in inflation and mortgage
rates, when payback periods for up-front investments were shorter.
Clean Energy New Hampshire (CENH) testified in opposition to the bill as
introduced, supporting the amendment that would update the energy code. CENH
encouraged the Committee to fact-check the study cited by NHHA, arguing that
the assumptions underlying the study were faulty and that CENH estimates
up-front cost impacts of the new energy code to be about $8000.
The Community Power Coalition of New Hampshire (CPCNH) testified in
opposition to the bill as written, supping the amendment that would update the
energy code, citing energy savings by homeowners and renters. CPCNH further
opined that these savings would increase as consumers adopt electric vehicles
and electric home heating, and that New Hampshire would forego about $4 million
of federal funding through P.L.
117-169 – The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) if it does not
adopt 2021 energy code.
Ted Evans, a building inspector who sits on the BCRB testified in support of
the amendment that would update the energy code, noting updating the energy
code would simplify the inspection process by aligning all building codes with
2021 standards.
The American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE), which develops building code standards, testified in
support of the amendment that would update the energy code. ASHRAE also
objected to the methods underlying the study cited by NHHA. ASHRAE emphasized
that insulation retrofits are ten times more expensive than installing
efficient insulation at the time of construction.
Majority of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee
reports Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution regarding environment
and natural resources as Inexpedient to Legislate
On February 6, 2024, the New Hampshire House of Representative’s Environment
and Agriculture (EA) Committee held an Executive
Session during which the Committee considered CACR14 – An Act Relating to the
Environment and Natural Resources and Providing that the State Shall Maintain
and Improve a Clean and Healthful Environment for Present and Future
Generations.
If enacted, this bill would direct the following constitutional amendment to
be proposed to New Hampshire voters as a ballot initiative during the November
2024 election:
The people of this state shall maintain and
improve a clean and healthful environment in New Hampshire for present and
future generations. The legislature and magistrates shall provide
adequate remedies for the protection of the environmental life support system
and provide adequate remedies to prevent unreasonable depletion and degradation
of natural resources.
The Majority of the EA Committee (13-7) reported the bill Inexpedient to
Legislate. The Minority of the EA Committee reported the bill Ought to Pass.
PUC authorizes Governance Council to include a regional
approach for the GRIP grant application for a statewide multi-use energy
platform, contingent on monthly progress reports
On February 8, 2024, in Docket
19-197, following a Status Conference for the Grid Resilience and
Innovation Partnerships (GRIP) Program, the New Hampshire Public Utilities
Commission (PUC) issued Order
No. 26,944. On January 26, 2024, Liberty Utilities (Liberty) filed a letter requesting
that the PUC preliminarily approve a regional approach for exploring
partnerships to submit grant applications seeking funding from the GRIP Program
for the Statewide Multi-Use Online Energy Data Platform. On January 29, 2024,
PUC issued a Procedure
Order scheduling a status conference on February 8to allow the Governance
Council (GC) “to present material to the PUC for discussion” on the matter of a
regional approach (as discussed in NE
Flash 24-5).
In Order 26,944, the PUC authorized the GC to include regional approach in
the GRIP grant application to the Data Platform development and ordered the GC
to file monthly report on its progress.
Back to Headlines
ISO
New England
FCA 18 clears at $3.58/kW-month, almost all new resources
were energy storage, solar, wind, or demand-reducing resources
On February 9, 2024, ISO-NE announced
and published results
from Forward Capacity Auction (FCA) 18 for the Capacity Commitment Period
beginning June 1, 2027 and ending May 31, 2028. Clearing prices for the Rest of
Pool (ROP), Northern New England, and Maine Capacity Zones were set at
$3.580/kW-month across all zones and import interfaces, with 31,556 MW of
secured capacity commitments. For comparison, last year’s clearing prices were
between $2.55/kW-month and $2.59/kW-month and clearing prices in the ROP zone
in the last three FCAs ranged between $2.59 and $2.61. The capacity market in
2027/2028 is estimated to be worth $1.3 billion.
Most new resources with capacity supply obligations were energy storage,
solar, wind, and “demand-reducing” resources. These included 185 MW of new wind
resources, and a combined 795 MW in new solar and energy storage resources.
Clean energy resources, new and existing, accounted for 5,540 MW, or 18% of all
capacity clearing the auction. There were four rounds of competitive bidding.
This auction closed with sufficient resources (nearly 1GW of surplus) to meet
the 30,550 installed capacity requirement, continuing a multi-year trend of
significant surpluses in the capacity market.
NEPOOL Transmission Committee continues discussions on Order
2023 compliance; votes not to support stakeholder amendments or ISO-NE proposal
On February 15, 2024, at the NEPOOL Transmission Committee (TC) meeting (agenda),
ISO‑NE presented its proposal to comply with FERC Order
2023 as well as some proposed stakeholder amendments. Ultimately, the
TC voted
not to support either any of the amendments or the main motion on ISO-NE
proposed compliance approach. As summarized in NE
Flash 23-31, Order 2023 required all regional transmission organizations
(RTOs) and independent system operators (ISOs) to adopt reforms revising their
generator interconnection procedures to address interconnection queue backlogs
and prevent undue discrimination against new technologies. We detailed ISO-NE’s
December
21, 2023 presentation, which summarized ISO-NE’s most recent compliance
plan, in NE
Special Flash 23-50.2. At the February meeting ISO-NE provided two
presentations on Order 2023, one responding
to stakeholder comments and recapping key compliance elements, which we
discuss below, and one summarizing
the redlined tariff (find the redlines here).
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-4, stakeholders have provided comments and amendments on the
tariff at previous TC meetings, some of which are repeated in this most recent
round of stakeholder submissions.
The following stakeholders provided comments and amendments to ISO-NE:
Glenvale proposed an amendment reducing both the Initial Commercial
Readiness Deposit (CRD) for Large Generator Interconnection Procedures (LGIP)
and Small Generator Interconnection Procedures (SGIP), and the Transitional
Cluster Study Entry CRD for SGIP. ISO-NE responded affirming the Initial CRD at
$250,000 for LGIP and $100,000 for SGIP, which ISO-NE indicted were based on
“recent history of study costs, and current deposit levels.”. Additionally,
ISO-NE corrected the Transitional Cluster Study Entry CRD for SGIP projects to
match the originally proposed amount of $500,000.
AEU proposed an amendment that ISO-NE establish reporting requirements and
an interconnection working group, though ISO-NE contends that it already
reports quarterly on interconnection metrics. AEU also asked that ISO‑NE
clarify the timeline for the cluster cycle process. ISO-NE elaborated that the
timeline exceeds FERC’s timeline by 60 days.
RENEW proposed an amendment that ISO-NE tracks the Network Resource
Interconnection Service (NRIS) and Capacity Network Resource Interconnection
Service (CNRIS) cluster study costs separately and allocate those costs
accordingly. NRIS and CNRIS cluster studies investigate energy interconnection
and capacity interconnection respectively. ISO-NE declined to consider this
amendment saying, “the study efforts needed to evaluate NRIS and CNRIS cannot
be separated.”
AEU and RENEW jointly proposed an amendment that ISO-NE provide a “single
limited opportunity” for interconnection customers to reduce upgrade costs by
reducing project size, and that ISO‑NE clarify what qualifies as a “material”
modification to the project plan in a material modification assessment. ISO-NE
demurred, referencing the FERC response in Order
2023 to a similar revision proposed by CREA and NewSun adjusting project
sizes that FERC refused, and did not elaborate further on what a “material”
modification would be.
New Leaf proposed an amendment that ISO-NE “continue studying late stage
serial System Impact Study (SIS) projects expected to receive draft SIS
reports” by July 15, which ISO-NE declined to do, calling the amendment “not
implementable.” ISO‑NE reiterated that the projects may request to pause study
work.
None of the amendments proposed above were approved by the TC in voting.
Looking ahead, the NEPOOL Participants Committee is scheduled to vote on the
proposal and proposed amendments on March 7. ISO-NE noted that it anticipates
filing its Order 2023-related tariff changes with FERC on April 1.
NEPOOL Reliability Committee continues discussing Resource
Adequacy Assessment changes associated with the Resource Capacity Accreditation
project
As last discussed in NE
Flash 24-6, in November 2023, in FERC
docket ER23-339, ISO-NE submitted its proposal
to delay Forward Capacity Auction #19, (FCA 19) for the 2028-2029 Capacity
Commitment Period (CCP) by one year (until 2026) to accommodate the resource
capacity accreditation (RCA) project. As a reminder, the RCA project proposes
improvements to ISO-NE’s accreditation processes in the Forward Capacity Market
(FCM) to further support a reliable, clean-energy transition by implementing
methodologies that will more appropriately accredit resource contributions to
resource adequacy as the resource mix transforms. We note that, as detailed in NE
Flash 24-6, on February 7, 2024, at the NEPOOL Markets Committee (MC)
meeting (see agenda),
ISO-NE presented
a proposal
to delay Forward Capacity Auction (FCA) 19 an additional two years, bringing
the delay to three years, to accommodate the design and implementation of a
prompt and seasonal market for the 2028-2029 Capacity Commitment Period (CCP).
With the proposed delay, FCA 19 would be run in February, 2028.
On February 14, 2024, the NEPOOL Markets Committee (MC) reviewed a presentation
by ISO‑NE outlining ISO-NE’s proposed resource adequacy assessment (RAA) load
modeling and capacity requirements as they pertain to the RCA project (see agenda).
For context, ISO-NE found that improvements are required to the RAA used
currently to calculate capacity requirements (demand) and develop
resource-specific accreditation values, as last discussed in NE
Flash 24-2. ISO-NE outlined its current load modeling process in the RAA:
the hourly gross load profile is first developed by scaling the 2002 hourly
load shape to reflect the forecasted seasonal “gross” peaks, which does reflect
demand response resources, but does not account for the impacts from behind the
meter (BTM) solar and transportation electrification load. Then, this hourly
load profile is further scaled to different levels to reflect the daily peak
load forecast uncertainty due to weather. ISO‑NE’s proposed four adjustments to
this process to accommodate the RCA project:
- Replace the 2002 hourly load shape with a composite
seasonal load shape that is based on the 2021 annual net load
characteristics and reflects the 2021 hourly weather for the summer and
the 2013/14 hourly weather for the winter. It is our understanding that
ISO-NE selected these time frames as they represent periods with
particularly extreme weather, and thus jeopardized grid reliability most
severely.
- Remove the anticipated effects of demand response
resources from the gross load forecast. ISO‑NE explained that it will
treat demand response resources essentially as load modifiers, each with
an associated profile and seasonal RCA values.
- Apply different energy scaling factors when the base
hourly load profile is scaled to different levels to reflect daily peak
load forecast uncertainty due to weather.
- Model BTM solar consistent with treatment of
supply-side solar resources.
ISO-NE explained that its capacity requirements calculations are
conceptually unchanged from what is done today; the net installed capacity
requirement (ICR) and total ICR will continue to be calculated in the context
of summer qualified capacity. ISO-NE noted this is also how its marginal
reliability improvement (MRI) system demand curves will be calculated, but
highlighted that its methodology for transforming these MRI and associated
capacity transfer limit (CTL) values into qualified marginal reliability impact
capacity (QMRIC) terms will be discussed at a future MC meeting. ISO-NE is
planning to use QMRIC values as a resources accredited capacity value in the
forward capacity auction (FCA).
Following its discussed of RAA modeling, ISO-NE provided a subsequent presentation
on gas and oil resource modeling, focusing on the and stakeholder feedback it
received on its first gas and oil modeling proposal. We detailed ISO-NE’s
proposal in NE
Flash 24-2, as well as stakeholder comments on its proposal. We summarize
key aspects of ISO-NE’s responses to the feedback as follows:
- Stakeholders asked for more information on the
estimated gas flows through the Maritimes & Northeast (M&N)
pipeline (which runs from Nova Scotia to northern Massachusetts). ISO-NE
provided a graphic showing the estimated north-to-south flows as a
function of heating degree days:

- Stakeholders asked to see renewable fuel oil (RFO)
inventories. ISO-NE provided the following graphic depicting RFO
inventories during a rolling 2-week period (see below). ISO-NE also noted
that, historically, RFO total inventory during a rolling 2-week period was
generally able to support more than 20 hours of continuous operation daily
at seasonal claimed capability.

Looking ahead, ISO-NE will apply its proposed gas and oil modeling
methodologies to conduct seasonal risk assessment and resource MRI calculations
for use in its impact analyses. ISO-NE plans to return to a MC meeting when
these results are ready for review and discussion, but a date for this has not
yet determined.
At NEPOOL Transmission Committee, ISO-NE discusses Phase 2
Longer-Term Transmission Planning Process and Supplemental Process; NextEra and
RI Energy provide supplementary presentations
On February 15, 2024, at the NEPOOL Transmission Committee (TC) meeting,
ISO‑NE provided a presentation on
the proposed Phase 2 tariff modifications for Longer-Term Transmission
Planning, continuing the discussion from the January 23, 2024 meeting
(discussed in NE
Flash 24-4). As discussed in NE
Flash 89.5, in June 2021, the New England States Committee on Electricity
(NESCOE) released a Report
to the New England Governors recommending revisions to the ISO‑NE
Tariff to “implement a state-led, proactive scenario-based planning process for
longer-term analysis of state mandates and policies as a routine planning
practice.” ISO-NE responded with revisions to Attachment K of its Open Access
Transmission Tariff (OATT) to accommodate long-term transmission planning. FERC
issued an Order accepting
the proposed changes to ISO‑NE’s OATT in February 2022 (discussed in NE
Flash 22-9). In October 2023, ISO-NE gave a Presentation on
the Phase 2 of OATT changes (discussed in NE
Flash 23-42), which aims to create a process to enable the development of
transmission infrastructure to address issues identified in Longer-Term
Transmission Studies, such as the 2050 Transmission Study. ISO-NE presented a
three-step “conceptual process” for transmission development with an RFP
Determination phase, RFP Issuance, Administration, Evaluation phase, and a
NESCOE Response phase.
At the February TC meeting, ISO-NE’s presentation covered
additional information on financial benefit evaluation factors, including:
- Avoided capital cost of local resources
- Production cost & congestion savings
- Avoided losses
- Reduced expected unserved energy
- Avoided transmission investment
ISO-NE also continued the discussion of redlined proposed tariff changes to Schedule
12, Attachment
K and Attachment P.
ISO-NE gave a second presentation
on the proposed supplemental
process. As discussed in NE
Flash 24-4, at the January 23 TC meeting, the NESCOE gave a presentation on
a proposed supplemental process “to increase the likelihood of a successful
solicitation,” which would be used only if no projects meet the required
benefit-to-cost ratio of 1.0. ISO NE’s presentation covered the
proposed tariff revisions that would add this supplemental process and
establish a process for NESCOE’s input into it.
NextEra Energy Transmission (NEET) gave a presentation
titled, “Competitive Transmission in New England: Challenges and Opportunities
for Improvement.” NEET highlighted findings from ISO-NE’s 2050
Transmission Study (draft discussed in NE
Flash 23-45) and expressed support for the creation of a competitive
process for long-term transmission needs to meet the gaps and goals identified
by the study. However, NEET raised three specific concerns with ISO‑NE’s
proposed tariff language. NEET argued that (verbatim):
- The prohibition on Qualified Transmission Project
Sponsors (QTPS) identifying new equipment on transmission owner property
or using incumbent rights-of-way will result in fewer competitive
proposals
- Prohibiting partial solutions reduces optionality and
flexibility
- Requiring a QTPS to identify non-pool transmission
facility upgrades in a comprehensive solution is prohibitive
Rhode Island Energy (RI Energy) gave a presentation
on its proposed amendments to the tariff revisions. RI Energy proposed that
ISO-NE amend the revisions such that:
- ISO-NE may accept and award targeted solutions, and not
limit awards to solutions that address all needs that are subject of a
solicitation (as RI Energy says the proposed revisions currently call for)
- Developers must segment their project proposals into
components (RI Energy gave the example of greenfield station, brownfield
station, greenfield transmission line, or brownfield transmission line
facilities) so that ISO-NE could coordinate “solution portfolios” with
components from multiple proposals
- ISO-NE may “augment” components of proposals such as
modifying termination points
ISO-NE will be requesting a vote on the proposed tariff revisions at the
March 27 TC meeting.
NEPOOL GIS Working Group considers APX’s proposal to
accommodate hourly certificates
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-5, on January 29, 2024, the NEPOOL GIS Working Group announced via
email that it would host a meeting on February 9to discuss a more detailed
proposal to accommodate hourly certificates.
On February 8, APX posted the proposal
and an associated “Requirement
Specification” document. According to the posted materials, APX proposes
to:
- Continue to associate each certificate with a monthly
vintage
- Only make hourly certificates available to resources
where:
- NEPOOL Generator = Yes
- Single fuel type
- Fuel type is
zero-emission
- Allow Account Holders to opt into hourly certificates
prior to each month (i.e., Account Holders cannot retroactively opt into
hourly tracking)
- APX is working with
ISO-NE to establish a new process to bring hourly data into the registry
for those Account Holders that opt into hourly certificates
- Mint certificates for those Account Holders that opt in
as “Hourly Eligible,” which would allow the Account Holders to make an
hourly claim against those certificates should the Account Holder then
choose to do so
- Change a holding from “Hourly Eligible” to “Hourly
Claimed” when the Account Holder makes an hourly claim against a holding
during a transfer
- Add new report types for Account Holders and
Administrators to review hourly claim information
According to an email sent out after the February 9 meeting, the Working
Group will reconvene either before or after APX estimates the number of
development hours required to make the proposed changes, depending on comments
and questions received regarding the proposal.
FERC continues to hold in abeyance the Section 206
proceeding on ISO-NE’s market power mitigation rules; Extends deadline from
February 1 to August 30
As discussed in NE
Flash 24-5, on January 29, 2024, in Dockets EL23-62 and ER24-324, ISO-NE
filed a Motion
for Continued Abeyance of the Section 206 proceeding regarding
ISO-NE’s market power mitigation rules. ISO-NE requested that FERC hold the
proceeding in abeyance through August 30, 2024.
On February 7, FERC issued an Order
accepting the Motion.
Background
As discussed in NE
Flash 23-28, the Section 206 proceeding emerged from Dynegy’s March
2023 Request for
the recovery of costs incurred while it was subject to market power mitigation
(and subsequently under-recovered costs) in the real-time energy market during
the capacity scarcity condition that occurred on December 24, 2022
(discussed in NE
Flash 23-7). In May 2023, FERC issued an Order approving
in part and denying in part Dynegy’s Request and opening a Section 206
proceeding on ISO-NE’s market power mitigation rules.
As discussed in NE
Flash 23-45, on November 2, 2023, in response to FERC’s May 2023 Order, ISO‑NE proposed
revisions to its Transmission,
Markets and Services Tariff to eliminate upward mitigation. ISO-NE
also requested additional time to complete additional analyses on “whether the
duration of general threshold energy mitigation is appropriate” and “whether a
Resource should be permitted to submit multiple fuel price adjustments that
reflect the cost of fuel for segments of its Supply Offer that exceed a
Resource’s Day-Ahead Energy Market awards.” As discussed in NE
Flash 23-50, on December 12, 2023, FERC issued an Order approving
ISO-NE’s proposed revisions but did not address ISO-NE’s request for
additional time.
NESCOE urges NETOs to complete Asset Condition Needs and
Solution Guidance Document by March
As last discussed in NE
Flash 24-1, on February 8, 2023, the New England States Committee on
Electricity (NESCOE) sent a Memorandum to
the New England Transmission Owners (NETOs), CC’ing the ISO-NE Planning
Advisory Committee (PAC), recommending enhancements to the asset condition
project process. As discussed in NE
Flash 23-29, on July 14, NESCOE sent a follow-up
Memorandum to the NETOs recommending four overarching improvements,
including the provision of one-, two-, five-, and fifteen-year forecasts of
asset condition projects. On August 8, the NETOs sent a reply that
addressed those recommendations and committed to process enhancements (as
discussed in NE
Flash 23-33).
Through the PAC, the NETOs have since solicited stakeholder comments on a
proposed asset condition project database (discussed in NE
Flash 23-38), provided an overview of
the asset condition project process (discussed in NE
Flash 23-42), released a draft five-year forecast of asset condition
projects and revised Asset
Condition Project Presentation Guidelines (discussed in NE
Flash 23-46), and provided an overarching status update (discussed in NE
Flash 24-1).
On February 8, 2024, NESCOE sent another Memorandum
to the NETOs, urging them to prioritize completing their promised Asset
Condition Needs and Solution Guidance Document “to enable state and stakeholder
discussion in March 2024.” The NETOs had recently noted in a Response
to a September 14, 2023, Memorandum
from the Consumer Advocates of New England that the Guidance Document “is
slated to be provided to stakeholders no
later than May 2024 (emphasis added).”
Back to Headlines
Regional
and National
NESCAUM releases Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by
nine states pledging to joint action to accelerate electrification as primary
means of transition to building sector emission reduction
On February 7, 2024, the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management
(NESCAUM) issued a press
release announcing that a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) has been signed by the environmental agencies of the
following states: California, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New
Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Rhode Island. Under the MOU, all aforementioned
states agreed to a shared goal in which heat pumps will meet 65% of
residential-scale heating, air conditioning, and water heating shipments by
2030 and 90% by 2040. The MOU also furthers the U.S.
Climate Alliance’s 2023 commitment to quadrupling the number of heat pump
installations in the U.S. by 2030. Further key objectives of the MOU are
outlined below (verbatim):
- Accelerate the transition to zero-emission buildings
through NESCAUM Building Electrification Initiative Task Force and
Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP)
- NESCAUM and NEEP will work with states to track market
progress for zero-emission space and water heater sales, shipments, and
installations and electrification or residential building stock
- NESCAUM and NEEP will work with states to develop the
Zero-Emission Residential Action Plan to enhance the electrification of
residential buildings
- Direct at least 40% of new investments in efficiency
and electrification upgrades for residential buildings to low-income and
disadvantaged communities
It is somewhat surprising that Vermont did not join the MOU, given that the
State has legally enforceable greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets,
significant heat pump penetrations, and is considering the development of a
Clean Heat Standard. As discussed in NE
Flash 79.7, Vermont passed the Vermont Global Warming Solutions Act of 2020
which requires state greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced by 40% by 2030 and
80% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. Regarding the states that did participate,
their participation is consistent with their economy-wide GHG reduction
targets, as well as the strict sectoral sub-targets several of the
participating states have (notably Massachusetts and New York).
Joint Federal-State Task Force on Electric Transmission to
meet on February 28 to discuss transmission siting; FERC appoints Mary Throne
to the Task Force to fill one-year vacancy

As discussed in NE
Special Flash 23-50.2, on December 14, 2023, in Docket AD21-15, FERC issued
a Notice,
announcing a meeting of
the Joint Federal-State Task Force on
Electric Transmission, on February 28, 2024 at 1:30pm. On
February 13, FERC posted an updated Notice
of Meeting and Agenda. A publicly available webcast will be available the
day of the meeting here.
According to the agenda, the focus of the meeting is transmission siting, and
includes two guest speakers from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Grid
Deployment Office. FERC created the
Task Force in June 2021 to explore topics related to transmission planning and
to make recommendations regarding FERC’s transmission policies.
As discussed in NE
Flash 23-2, the Task Force is made up of all of the FERC Commissioners (up
to five but as discussed in this Flash Update there are currently only three)
and ten state commissioners. On February 13, FERC posted an Order
Listing New Member announcing that Chair Mary Throne of the Wyoming Public
Service Commission will serve the remainder of her predecessor’s term. As
discussed in NE
Flash 24-5, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners nominated Mary
Throne in January following the resignation of Chair Thad LeVar from the Utah
Public Service Commission.
Virginia House and Senate each pass bills to expand Dominion
community solar program, and create community solar program in Appalachian
Power Company territory
On February 13, 2024, the House and Senate of the Virginia General Assembly,
respectively, passed four community solar bills (i.e. each chamber passed two
bills, both the companion bills for the bills passed by the other chamber). We
last discussed each bill in NE Flash 24-4.
SB 253 – Shared Solar Programs; Amends
Existing Program Provisions To Apply To Dominion Energy Virginia
passed by a vote of 23-17.
The companion House bill, HB 106, passed the House 24-44.
Both bills were amended out of the committees of origin, and have identical
language. If enacted as passed by the chambers amended, these bills would:
- Establish the current 200 MW community solar program in
Dominion territory as the “part 1” program, and add a 150 MW “part 2”
program
- 75 MW of the part 2
program capacity “shall serve no more than 51 percent low-income
customers”
- Stipulate that subscriber organization own the RECs
from solar facilities in part 1 of the program, but that RECs must be
turned over to Dominion in part 2 of the program
- Permit projects to receive compensation adders if they
are located on “rooftops, brownfields, or landfills, are dual-use
agricultural facilities, or meet the definition of another category
established by the [Virginia] Department of Energy [(VA DOE)]” and
requires the VA DOE to convene a stakeholder group to determine said
adders
- Limit the minimum bill for community solar subscribers
to the incremental cost to Dominion process bills for the program, and
requires the State Corporation Commission (SCC) to initiate a proceeding
to revaluate the minimum bill
- Requires Dominion to utilize net crediting for the
program
SB 255 Shared Solar Programs; SCC To
Establish By Regulation passed by a vote of 21-16.
The companion House bill,
HB 108, passed the
House 55-44.If
enacted as passed by the chambers, this bills have identical language and
would:
- Establish a 50 MWAC (or 6% of peak load,
whichever is less) shared solar program in Appalachian Power Company
(APCO) territory. The SCC must establish regulations for the program
by January 1, 2025, require APCO to file any “tariffs, agreements, or
forms necessary for implementation of the program” by July 1, 2025.
- Shared solar facilities would be limited to 5 MW, on a
single parcel of land, and must have at least three subscribers, and 40%
of the projects capacity must be allocated to subscriptions of 25 kW or
less. Subscriptions must be sized to annual load of the subscriber.
- A bill credit from a shard solar facility “shall be
calculated by multiplying the subscriber’s portion of the kilowatt-hour
electricity production from the shared solar facility by the applicable
bill credit rate for the subscriber”
- The bill credit rate is
defined as the volumetric rate on the subscriber’s bill
- Bill credits must be in
monetary value (not kWh)
- Unused bill credits
would carry over from month to month, with no apparent expiration date
- The subscriber
organization could accumulate bill credits if the solar facility is
undersubscribed, and allocate to eventual subscribers
- APCO would be required to provide bill credits to a
shared solar facility for a term of 25 years after the commencement of
commercial operation
- RECs from the shared solar facilities shall be turned
over to APCO and retied for compliance purposes.
- Permit projects to receive compensation adders if they
are located on “rooftops, brownfields, or landfills, are dual-use
agricultural facilities, or meet the definition of another category
established by the [VA DOE]” and requires the VA DOE to convene a
stakeholder group to determine said adders
- The SCC shall establish a minimum bill for shared solar
subscribers, which shall be “based on the subscriber’s customer class of
residential, commercial, or industrial. Each class’s applicable credit
rate shall be calculated by the SCC annually by dividing revenues to the
class by sales, measured in kilowatt-hours, to that class to yield a bill
credit rate for the class ($/kWh).”
- The minimum bill shall
“include the costs of all utility infrastructure and services used to
provide electric service and administrative costs of the shared solar
program.” In setting the bill, the SCC shall consider (verbatim):
- further costs the SCC
deems relevant to ensure subscribing customers pay a fair share of the
costs of providing electric services,
- minimize the costs
shifted to customers not in a shared solar program
- calculate the benefits
of shared solar to the electric grid and to the Commonwealth and deduct
such benefits from other costs
February 14 was the crossover day in the Virginia General Assembly, meaning
all bills that have not passed on chamber are dead. Given that the House and
Senate passed identical versions of the same bills, the change of passage in
agreement by the other chamber is highly likely. However, given the close votes
and largely partisan divide in the roll calls, it is likely that Governor Glenn
Youngkin (R) would veto the bills, and a veto override would be unlikely.
Willie Phillips named new FERC chair; Comm. Allison Clements
will not seek second term
On February 9, 2024, in a press
release, the White House announced that President Joe Biden has appointed
Willie Phillips to be the Chair of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Phillips has served as a FERC Commissioner since November 2021 and as an Acting
Chair since January 2023. In addition to Phillips, the current
Commissioners include Allision Clements and Mark Christie.
According to Politico, Commissioner Clements will not seek a second term at
FERC. Her last day would be June 30, 2024, but she could remain at FERC until
the end of this Congressional session, which is expected to end on January 3,
2025. With three commissioners currently serving, FERC has the minimum quorum
number for operating, but there could not be any tied votes, as actions require
a majority of the up to five-member commission. It’s unclear when President Joe
Biden may make additional FERC nominations. Nominations to FERC are overseen by
the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee which is chaired by Joe
Manchin (D-W.Va.). Manchin opposed former FERC Chairman Richard Glick’s efforts
to consider climate change when accessing natural gas pipeline projects,
leading to Glick’s departure. As a result, it’s widely believed that nominees
with ambitious climate goals may face a difficult path to confirmation.
East Coast states, led by NYSERDA, issue RFP for Regional
Fund Administrator for an Offshore Wind Fisheries Mitigation Fund; Round 1
applications due March 20
As discussed last in NE
Flash 22-49, the eleven East Coast states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina,
Rhode Island, and Virginia have been collaborating to establish a “consistent
regional approach” for administering financial compensation to fisheries
impacted by offshore wind development. On February 9, 2024, on behalf of the
group of states, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
(NYSERDA) issued a Request for Proposals seeking a Regional Fund Administrator
to design and develop the fund and related processes. Round 1 proposals are due March 20.
Details on how to apply are available on NYSERDA’s RFP webpage.
The Special Initiative on Offshore Wind (SIOW) and Consensus
Building Institute have been facilitating the states’ discussions on a regional
approach to fisheries compensatory mitigation. Additional information is
available on the SIOW website,
including the Scoping
Document for the Fisheries Mitigation Project and a timeline of the
efforts to date.
Eversource announces agreement to sell stakes in Revolution
Wind and South Fork Wind to Global Infrastructure Partners
On February 13, 2024, Eversource Energy (Eversource) announced
that it had executed an agreement to sell its 50% share in both the 132 MW
South Fork Wind and 704 MW Revolution Wind offshore wind projects to Global
Infrastructure Partners (GIP) for $1.1 billion. The projects had been joint
ventures with Ørsted, who will retain its 50% ownership
interests. According to the press release, the agreement allows Eversource
to exit the projects while retaining cost sharing obligations for the
construction of Revolution Wind. Eversource also signed an agreement with Ørsted
in January to sell Ørsted its share of the 924 MW Sunrise Wind offshore wind
project (also a joint venture), contingent on the project’s selection in New
York’s fourth offshore wind solicitation. If Sunrise wind is not selected,
then Ørsted and Eversource’s joint venture for the project will remain in
place until the two companies evaluate next steps. Otherwise, the sale of
Eversource’s stake in these three projects represents the Eversource’s exit
from offshore wind. The deal is expected to close later this year.
PJM and NJBPU file State Agreement Approach 2.0 Study
Agreement with FERC, beginning process to study additional offshore wind
transmission procurement
On February 5, 2024, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) announced
that PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM) had filed an executed State
Agreement Approach (SAA) 2.0 Study Agreement between PJM and NJBPU with
FERC. The Agreement allows New Jersey to initiate a PJM study and informational
analysis to evaluate scenarios of the injection of an additional 3.5 GW of
offshore wind into New Jersey. Following NJBPU review of the study, NJBPU will
inform PJM of the actual amount and injection points of offshore wind
interconnection that NJBPU would like included and considered in a competitive
solicitation for transmission solutions. A February 6 PJM Transmission
Expansion Advisory Committee presentation
preliminarily indicates that the 2.0 Study will occur through June, and a
competitive solicitation for transmission solutions may open in July. Selection
of final solutions is anticipated in Q2 2025.
As discussed in NE
Flash 22-43, on October 26, 2022, the NJBPU issued an Order selecting
the Larrabee Tri-Collector Solution and supporting projects under the SAA 1.0
solicitation for offshore wind transmission solutions. As discussed in NE
Flash 85.4, on November 18, 2020, New Jersey became the first state to seek
implementation of the SAA when NJBPU issued an Order formally
requesting that PJM integrate New Jersey’s offshore wind goal into the grid
operator’s transmission planning process through the SAA approach, established
by PJM under its FERC Order
1000 compliance. Under the SAA, states can work with PJM to identify the
need for transmission improvements, and afterwards can formally request that
PJM solicit transmission solutions to meet the identified need in its Regional
Transmission Expansion Plan process.
Maryland Office of People’s Counsel tells FERC to reject PJM
cost allocation proposal for $5 billion of transmission investments
On February 9, 2024, in FERC Docket ER24-843, the Maryland Office of
People’s Counsel (OPC) filed a Protest
and Comments urging FERC to reject PJM Interconnection’s proposed
cost allocation for over $5 billion in transmission investments, or to
require PJM to address the problems OPC outlined in its filing. In a press
release, OPC called PJM’s proposal “fundamentally unfair to Maryland
utility customers” because the proposed spending is primarily driven by the
anticipated demand of 7.5 GW of new data center power demands in Virginia. OPC
argued that the data center load growth is driven by Virginia public policy
interventions, and consequently that PJM should have used the “multi-driver
project” cost allocation methodology that assigns greater costs to the state
with the policy that is driving the demand. OPC also argued that as proposed,
Maryland ratepayers face the risk of paying “for expensive projects that were
never needed” should the projected demand increases not come to fruition (such
as the data centers not being built).
Other Regional and National News of Note
- Deep
Wind Offshore enters collaboration with Hydepoint to produce offshore
hydrogen:
On January 31, 2024, Deep Wind Offshore announced
that it entered a collaboration with Hydepoint to explore hydrogen
production from offshore wind. The collaborators plan to explore hydrogen
export pipelines in Norway, Sweden, and Finland to Germany, citing that
hydrogen produced by offshore wind will reduce the need for investing in
and upgrading existing infrastructure as current grids are not equipped to
receive the amount of power or peak generated by renewable energy. The
project would help meet the European Commission’s and European Union’s
targets of installing 500 GW of offshore and onshore wind and 20 millions
tons of hydrogen produced by renewable energy by 2030.
- NREL
report finds that cost is a barrier to heat pump installations: On February 12, 2024,
the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) announced
that it released a Report
which found that while millions of American homes would benefit from
having a heat pump, the installation cost would need to be drastically
reduced in order to be adopted by more homes. The Report also found that
following a heat pump installation, 62-95% of households would have a
reduction in energy bills, and greenhouse gas emissions in the residential
sector would reduce by 36%-64%.
- NREL
launching Grid Planning and Analysis Center (GPAC) webinar series on March
12:
On February 9, 2024, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) announced
that it will launch its “Powered
By” webinar series in March. The webinars will take place
from 12 to 1 p.m. ET the second Tuesday of every month. Each webinar will
feature a different GPAC tool or set of tools in the context of a
real-world project. When possible, sessions will include people from
industry who have used GPAC tools and capabilities to inform their grid
planning.”
- DOE
issues FOA for RD&D / 2024 Regional Resource Hubs for Purpose-Grown
Energy Crops, concept papers due March 14: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) issued Funding Opportunity Announcement for its 2024 Regional
Resource Hubs for Purpose-Grown Energy Crops program. The FOA
supports the focus of the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) Renewable
Carbon Resources Program which is “developing strategies and supporting
technology development to reduce the cost, improve the quality, increase
the quantity, and maximize the environmental benefits of using renewable
carbon resources.” Concept
Papers are due March 15, 2024 at 5:00pm.
- DOE
announces new appointees and promotions: On February 7,
2024, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a press
release announcing new appointees and promotions. We list the
appointees, followed by their position and office:
- Tylor Collier, Special
Assistant to the Deputy Chiefs of Staff, Office of the Secretary
- Chloe Kosseff, Special
Assistant, Office of Science
- Sneha Nair, Special
Assistant, Nuclear Security
- Allie Peck, Press
Assistant, Office of Public Affairs
- Alexandra Teitz, Deputy
General Counsel for Energy Efficiency and Clean Energy Demonstration,
Office of the General Council
- We
list the promoted appointees, followed by their new position and office:
- Liz Berliant, White
House Liaison, Office of the Secretary
- Amanda Finney, Director
of Public Affairs, Office of Public Affairs
- Vanessa Grisko, Chief
of Staff, Office of Energy Jobs
- Cate Hurley, Deputy
Speechwriter, Office of Public Affairs
- Charmisa Troiano, Chief
Spokesperson, Office of Public Affairs
- Rebecca Ward, Chief of
Staff, Office of Manufacturing and Supply Chains
- DOE
announces
$15.7 million
funding opportunity to advance the domestic manufacturing of next
generation batteries and energy storage: On January 29,
2024, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a press
release announcing a $15.7 million funding
opportunity for projects that will advance manufacturing technologies
for batteries. $10.7 million is available for projects advancing
sodium-ion batteries, flow batteries, and nanolayered films. $5 million is
available for projects advancing smart manufacturing platforms for
batteries. Concept papers are due on March 4, 2024 at 5:00pm.
- Transmission
Coalition campaign launched by Advanced Energy United et al: On January 25, 2024, six
organizations led by Advanced
Energy United launched a new coalition called “Transmission
Possible.” The Coalition aims to solve grid congestion issues by
supporting building transmission lines across states and updating
transmission infrastructure. In January 2024, a working paper published by
the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) titled “Power
Flows: Transmission Lines and Corporate Profits” provided a research
base for the Coalition’s argument. The Working Paper researched the
economic and societal benefits and costs of connecting the transmission
lines between Southwest Power Pool (SPP) and Midcontinent Independent
System Operator (MISO).
- Advanced
Energy United holds webinar on Preparing States for the Evolution of Home
Heating Technologies February 29: Advanced Energy United announced that it will host a
webinar discussing how states could utilize new residential electric
heating technologies and analyze the evolving trends on February 29, 2024.
The webinar will use case studies from Michigan and Illinois
and discuss findings from the Report “Consumers
Energy Gas Bill Impact Analysis.” Registration
is available online.
- BOEM
announces final Wind Energy Areas for Oregon: On February 14, 2024,
the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) announced
two Wind Energy Areas (WEAs) off the coast of Oregon. The Coos Bay WEA is
61,204 acres and is located 32 miles from shore. The Brookings WEA is
133,808 acres and is located 18 miles from shore. BOEM also released a map
of the WEAs. Interested parties may comment
on the WEAs by March
15, 2024, at 11:59pm (instructions for how to comment are
posted here).
- DOE
announces initiative to improve forecasting for offshore wind projects: On February 15, 2025,
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a press
release announcing the launch of an 18-month initiative to gather
weather, ocean, and wildlife data near the sites of active offshore wind
farms and lease areas off the coast of the Northeast United
States. The effort is part of Phase 3 of the Wind
Forecast Improvement Project, a collaboration between DOE and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
- NC
Clean Energy Technology Center Releases 50 States of Power Decarbonization
2023 Annual Review & Q4 2023 Report, finds 609 actions related to
electric power decarbonization and resource planning in the U.S. in 2023: On February 15,
2024, the North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (NCCETC) released
its 2023 annual review and Q4 2023 edition of the 50
States of Power Decarbonization. The Q4 Report provides updates
on state and utilities’ activities related to clean energy deployment,
climate goal progress, emissions reduction plan and generation and
procurement rules. The 2023 Annual Report found that the most popular
trend for states and utilities is setting 100% clean energy goals. The
Annual Report also concluded that there are 120,913 MW of solar, 70,863 MW
of wind, 56,277 of storage in total among integrated resource plans in
2023.
- 2024
U. S. Energy and Employment Report (USEER) Survey: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is conducting 2024
United States Energy and Employment Report (USEER) Survey in the
energy, energy-related, and advanced manufacturing sectors to provide
policy makers, business leaders, and energy stakeholders with key
information. This survey aims to better understand the strengths,
weaknesses, barriers, and opportunities in the energy sector. DOE has
partnered with an independent research firm BW Research Partnership on the
engagement for this survey. Follow the above link to participate in the
survey.
- DOE
Awards $60 Million to three Geothermal Energy projects: On February 13, 2024,
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that it awarded $60 million
to three
enhanced geothermal systems projects. The goal of these awards is to
explore ways of providing reliable and cost-effective electricity from
geothermal energy in the future. The awards are also part of DOE’s Enhanced
Geothermal Shot initiative that seeks to cut the cost of EGS 90%.
- Rocky
Mountain Institute: Grid-enhancing technologies could facilitate 6.6 GW of
clean energy in five PJM states, saving $1B a year: During the week of
February 12, 2024, the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) issued a Report
which found that the installation of grid-enhancing technologies
(GETs) such as dynamic line rating and power flow controllers in the PJM
region could facilitate the interconnection of 6.6 GW of renewable energy
by 2027. RMI estimates that using GETs rather than default transmission
system upgrades would save the region $1 billion per year through 2027.
- Pennsylvania
DEP to hold webinar regarding Roadmap for Industrial Decarbonization
February 22: On
February 22, 2024 at 3:00pm, the Ohio River Valley Institute, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection, and Strategen Consulting have
scheduled a one-hour webinar to
discuss the findings of “A Roadmap for Industrial Decarbonization in
Pennsylvania,” the State’s first industrial decarbonization plan.
Interested parties may register here.
Back to Headlines
Read this flash online
Best regards,
The SEA Team

Sustainable Energy Advantage, LLC
John Keene - Senior
Director
Tel. 508-665-5870 | jkeene@seadvantage.com
www.seadvantage.com

Connect with SEA!
Eyes & Ears Terms
and Conditions
Eyes & Ears Service is provided to the Subscriber for the Subscriber’s
internal use only, and may be distributed to employees, officers and directors
of Subscriber or Authorized Affiliate who have been made aware of the
Limitations on Use under the Subscription Agreement. Subscriber agrees not to
distribute materials received under the Eyes & Ears Service, whether by
written, oral or electronic means, to any other person, including consultants
engaged by Subscriber, except with specific written permission from SEA or as
required by applicable law, regulatory proceeding or exchange rule. Subscriber
is subject to additional terms and conditions stated in the Subscription
Agreement.